home
discussion papers
breaking news
about the audit
main audit
focussed audits
audit submissions
events
archive search by

(1) subject

* Accountability
* Constitution/federalism * Electoral * Felon disenfranchisement * Incumbency benefits * Media * NGO/Participation * Parliament * Parties/independents * Political finance/
government advertising
* Public opinion * Public service/
statutory bodies
* Rights

(2) keyword/author
contact us
links
info for authors
reading
political
equality
popular control
of government
civil rights/
human rights
inclusive
public debate

Like to get on our breaking news email list? Click here


About the audit

Since 2002 a team at the Australian National University has been engaged in auditing the strengths and weaknesses of Australian democracy.

Aims

The Audits have three main aims:

(1) To make a major methodological contribution to the assessment of democracy—particularly through the study of federalism and through incorporating disagreements about ‘democracy’ into the research design;

(2) To provide benchmark data for international comparisons and comparisons over time.

(3) To promote public debate over democratic issues by publishing discussion papers and disseminating Audit findings through the media.

Approach

The Audit recognises that democracy is a complex notion, and so applies a detailed set of questions which has already been field-tested in overseas countries. The framework was pioneered in the United Kingdom and then further developed under the auspices of the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) in Stockholm. IDEA further tested the framework in eight countries including New Zealand. IDEA is currently updating its Audit framework to take account of the experience of further national Audits, including the Democratic Audit of Australia. As noted, our Audit has expanded the framework to include institutions of federalism and also to draw more explicit attention to conflict between democratic values.

The values used by the Democratic Audit of Australia as the basis of assessment are:

  • political equality
  • popular control of government
  • civil liberties and human rights
  • the quality of public deliberation

The Audit adopts a comparative approach across Australia's nine jurisdictions and uses three main international comparators:

  • Canada
  • New Zealand
  • the United Kingdom

Funding

The Audit is supported by the Australian Research Council (DP0211016 and DP0557055). The Audit is also grateful for support received from: the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia; the National Social Science Visits Program, ANU; International IDEA; the Swedish Government; and the Centre for Democratic Institutions.

People

In January the Democratic Audit of Australia moved to the School of Social Sciences from the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University.

The Audit is led by Professor Marian Sawer. For some of Marian's recent books go to this link.


The other Chief Investigator is Professor Barry Hindess who prepared the Audit Report on Corruption and Democracy in Australia. More details
[]


The Audit Project Manager is Dr Philip Larkin, who joined the Audit from the UK House of Commons committee secretariat in 2005.

Peter Brent is an Audit Team member and Webmaster. Peter is doing doctoral research on the history of electoral administration funded by a Linkage grant with the Electoral Council of Australia (LPO453987 ). His thesis findings are disseminated through his website.


Another important member of the Audit Team is Norm Kelly, a former Democrats member of the WA Legislative Council. He is doing a PhD analysing changes in electoral law over the past 20 years and is also an Affiliate of the Centre for Democratic Institutions.


Dr Norman Abjorensen is the latest recruit to the Audit and is working on the State of Democracy Report. A former journalist, Norman completed a PhD on leadership in the Liberal Party in 2004 and now teaches part-time at the ANU.


Dr June Verrier, former Head of the Parliamentary Research Service, has joined the Democratic Audit as a Visiting Fellow until the end of 2007. She is undertaking a comparative study of how administrative and funding arrangements can promote the independence of parliament from executive government.

International Advisory Committee

Professor David Beetham, Director, Centre for Democratisation Studies, University of Leeds

Dr Helena Catt, Electoral Commissioner, New Zealand

Professor Arend Lijphart, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego

Professor Pippa Norris, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

Professor Olof Petersson, Co-ordinator, SNS Democratic Audits of Sweden

Professor Stein Ringen, Green College, University of Oxford

Professor Hege Skjeie, Department of Political Science, Oslo University

Professor Stuart Weir, Director, UK Democratic Audit, University of Essex

Academic Advisory Committee

Professor Larissa Behrendt, Director, Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning, University of Technology, Sydney

Professor Hilary Charlesworth, Faculty of Law, The Australian National University

Professor Murray Goot, Department of Politics and International Relations, Macquarie University

Professor Colin Hughes, School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland

Professor Dean Jaensch, School of Political & International Studies, Flinders University

Professor Graham Maddox, School of Social Science, University of New England

Professor Geoff Stokes, School of Social & International Studies, Deakin University

Professor Elaine Thompson, School of Politics and International Relations, University of New South Wales

Professor John Wanna, ANZSOG, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University

Professor George Williams, Director, Gilbert & Tobin Centre of Public Law, University of New South Wales