ISR logo

home
discussion papers
breaking news
about the audit
main audit
focussed audits
audit submissions
events
archive search by

(1) subject

* Accountability
* Constitution/federalism * Electoral * Felon disenfranchisement * Incumbency benefits * Media * NGO/Participation * Parliament * Parties/independents * Political finance/
government advertising
* Public opinion * Public service/
statutory bodies
* Rights

(2) keyword/author
contact us
links
info for authors
reading

Important message

The Democratic Audit of Australia is now at democraticaudit.org.au.

This page has been archived. It has been left at this URL to ensure the persistence of links that have been made to it from other resources. It may contain broken links and out-of-date information.

Go to the new Audit site.


Breaking News

29 October 2008

Donations inquiry

Members of the Democratic Audit gave evidence to the Joint Select Committee on Electoral Matters’ inquiry into the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2008 in Canberra on 22 September 2008. The committee endorsed the Bill with minor amendments.

  • Read the transcript of the Audit’s evidence here
  • JSCEM’s inquiry report is available here


Green paper delays

Geoffrey Barker reports on the progress of the federal government’s two electoral reform green papers on Australian Policy Online.

  • Read the article here


Lessons from the United States

Audit member Brian Costar compared the US and Australian political donation regimes and found that theirs is much more transparent than ours in an article for the new website, Inside Story, published by the Institute for Social Research at Swinburne University of Technology.

  • Read the article here


Lessons from Australia

Journalist Jill Lepore provided a lively history of the evolution of ballot voting in the United States – with appropriate references to the ‘Australian Ballot’ – in the New Yorker on 13 October 2008.

• Read the article here


Gender and democracy

A new website to be launched in November will provide resources for those interested in feminist thought at its intersection with democracy, and a place for debate about these issues. According to the founders of the site, Jasmine Westendorf and Ruby Murray, “By examining the way in which gender interacts with democratic processes and debates, The Democracy Project seeks to collapse areas that are currently considered ‘women’s issues’ into broader societal discourse and research, and show that a healthy, functioning democracy requires that we re-negotiate the way in which the boundaries between gender and society are drawn.”

  • Visit The Democracy Project here


Reforming question time

In An Opportunity for Revitalization, Senator Alan Ferguson recommends replacing the current system, of one question without notice and one supplementary question from the questioner, with a system of one primary question on notice and multiple supplementary questions not confined to the questioner, and a stricter requirement for relevance of answers.

  • Read the discussion paper here


Queensland government welcomes FOI report

The Queensland government has expressed full support for 116 of the recommendations in The Right to Information, David Solomon’s review of Queensland’s Freedom of Information laws. The government either partially or in principle supports another 23 recommendations, with only two recommendations not accepted.

  • The Queensland government’s response to the Solomon report, and the report itself, are available here

Local government in New South Wales

This Briefing Paper by Jason Arditi of the Research Service, Parliament of New South Wales, looks at the operation of local government in NSW, examining the history and constitutional foundation of local government, together with the salient features of the Local Government Act 1993 and the service and regulatory functions set out by the Act.

  • Read the paper here

Indigenous governance

In Contested Governance: Culture, Power and Institutions in Indigenous Australia, a collection of papers from the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, contributors examine the dilemmas and challenges involved in the Indigenous struggle for the development and recognition of systems of governance that they recognise as both legitimate and effective.

  • Read this eBook here


Auditing handbook

The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) has released Assessing the Quality of Democracy: An Overview of the International IDEA Framework, which presents the organisation’s State of Democracy (SoD) Assessment Framework. Developed for public use around the world, the SoD Framework has to date been applied in some 20 countries worldwide since its first launch in 2000.

  • The report is available here


New Zealand electoral review

In September the NZ government announced the terms of reference and membership of an expert panel to review electoral administration and political party funding. A question mark hangs over the future of the committee, however, with the National Party indicating that it would abandon the plan if it wins government.

  • Details of the panel’s work and composition are available here

19 September 2008

Green paper

The first of the federal government’s electoral law green papers, due in July, has been delayed. Reports suggest that the paper has encountered opposition among government MPs over proposals to tighten controls over disclosure, funding and expenditure.

  • The background to the green paper is here


Citizenship test

Also running late is the report of the federal government’s inquiry into the citizenship test, chaired by Richard Woolcott, which was presented to the government some time ago but has not been yet made public. The report is expected to recommend abandoning the current test in favour of a test that concentrates on questions relating to Australia’s system of government and legal arrangements.


Commissioner returns to Veterans Affairs

Having served just over three years of his five year term the Australian Electoral Commissioner, Ian Campbell, has been appointed head of the Department of Veterans Affairs. This is the first time a serving Commissioner has been appointed to another public service position.

  • Read John Faulkner’s media release here


2007 election inquiry

Hearings of the inquiry into the 2007 federal election by the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters are almost complete.

  • Submissions to the inquiry and Hansard transcripts of the hearings are available here


Queensland electoral inquiry

 The Queensland Parliament’s Legal, Constitutional and Administrative Review Committee is conducting an Inquiry into Certain Contemporary Electoral Matters. Submissions are due by 31 October 2008.

  • Read the issues paper here


New boundaries in Queensland

Also in Queensland, the state’s electoral redistribution has been completed.

  • Read the report and view the maps here


Indigenous rights

In Indigenous Rights and the Constitution: Making the Case for Constitutional Reform, Megan Davis from the Indigenous Law Centre argues that we need to emphasise the connection between dealing with disadvantage, an urgent and immediate priority, and the ‘big picture’ in terms of addressing unfinished business between Indigenous peoples and the state.

  • The full text is available here (PDF)


Executive scrutiny improved

Drawing on figures compiled by the Department of the Senate, the Australian Financial Review reported on 26 August that the Rudd government has a better record of responding to written parliamentary questions than its predecessor. Comparing two periods, February–May 2007 and February–May 2008, the figures show that the current government answered 97 per cent of written questions lodged during additional Estimates sessions compared to 58 per cent answered by its predecessor, and 78 per cent of questions on notice compared to 55 per cent.


Senate and accountability

The 48th edition of Papers on Parliament, published in January but only just having appeared on the Audit radar, is on the theme of ‘The Senate and Accountability’. The topics and authors in this volume are: The Selection of Judges for Commonwealth Courts (Sir Gerard Brennan); The States, the Commonwealth and the Crown – the Battle for Sovereignty (Anne Twomey); What Did the ‘Yes’ Vote Achieve? Forty Years After the 1967 Referendum, (Larissa Behrendt); Mandates, Consensus, Compromise, and the Senate (Stanley Bach); The Senate, Accountability and Government Control (Harry Evans); Parliamentary Privilege and Search Warrants: Will the US Supreme Court Legislate for Australia? (Harry Evans).

  • The full volume is available here (PDF)


Review of the NSW Freedom of Information Act 1989

Bruce Barbour, the NSW Ombudsman, has released a discussion paper as part of a broader investigation by the office into the processes and procedures surrounding freedom of information in New South Wales. This investigation will also involve reviewing documents and auditing randomly selected files from 18 different government agencies, as well as interviewing agency staff who deal with FOI applications.

  • Read the paper here


Approval for lobbyist code

In Knock, knock... Who’s There? The Lobbying Code of Conduct, the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration reports that it received evidence from a variety of organisations and individuals generally welcoming the Lobbying Code of Conduct. Some concerns were expressed, however, and the committee proposes to review the operation of the Code towards the end of 2009.

  • Read the full report here


Whistleblowing under the microscope

Edited by A. J. Brown, Whistleblowing in the Australian Public Sector, published by ANU E Press, draws on one of the world’s most comprehensive research projects on the phenomenon. Evidence from over 8,000 public servants in over 100 federal, state and local government agencies shows that whistleblowers can and do survive, and that often their role is highly valued.

  • The full text is available here


Not so fearless?

Also new from ANU E Press is Whatever Happened to Frank and Fearless? The Impact of New Public Management on the Australian Public Service, by Kathy MacDermott. Changes in the culture of the Australian Public Service have led many contemporary commentators to lament the purported loss of traditional public service values. MacDermott argues that structural and cultural change compromising the integrity of the public service reached its apogee towards the end of the eleven years of the Howard government.

  • The full text is available here


The role of NGOs

Agreeing to disagree: Maintaining dissent in the NGO sector, a new report by The Australia Institute’s Gemma Edgar, considers whether a formal agreement between government and NGOs, foreshadowed by the Rudd Government, is the right way for the government and the community sector to go about building an on-going positive and constructive relationship.

  • The full report is available here (PDF)


Privacy report released

The Australian Law Reform Commission has released a major report, For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice. Among other things, the report calls for: simplification and streamlining of the Privacy Act and related laws and regulations; uniform privacy principles and national consistency; regulation of cross-border data flows; rationalisation of exemptions and exceptions; improved complaint handling and stronger penalties; and more comprehensive credit reporting.

  • The report is available here


Bicameralism compared

A free conference, Bicameralism: Australia in Comparative Context, will be held at Parliament House on 9-10 October 2008. The conference will locate the Australian Senate, and selected aspects of Australian state parliamentary arrangements, in an international context of bicameral parliamentary systems. The conference is sponsored by the Parliamentary Studies Centre and the Crawford School of Economics and Government at ANU in conjunction with the Departments of the Senate and House of Representatives.

  • Full details are available here

18 July 2008

 

Auditing campaigns

The Special Minister of State, Senator John Faulkner, and the Minister for Finance and Deregulation, Lindsay Tanner, have issued new guidelines for federal government advertising under which all ad campaigns costing over $250,000 will be scrutinised by the Auditor-General.


JSCEM 2007 election inquiry

The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) has advertised a series of public hearings relating to its inquiry into the conduct of the 2007federal election.

  • Further information is available here


Whistleblower inquiry

The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs is inquiring into whistleblowing protections within the Australian Government public sector to develop a preferred model. Interested organisations and individuals are invited to make submissions by Friday 8 August 2008.

  • More information is available here


A new Indigenous representative body

Tom Calma, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, has released Building a Sustainable National Indigenous Representative Body: Issues for Consideration, an issues paper examining the issues that need to be considered in the formulation of a new representative body. The report does not propose a model for the body itself.

  • Read the report here


Constitutional consequences

Reforming our Constitution, a new report from the House of Representatives Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee, examines the consequences of the lack of reform to the Constitution in recent decades. It recommends that all intergovernmental agreements are referred to a parliamentary committee for scrutiny, and advocates greater public debate on constitutional reform – particularly on issues such as whether the Constitution should be revised to “acknowledge where we as Australians have come from”;set out rights and protections as well as practical national governance structures; andarticulate aspirations for a nation.

  • Read the full report here


The business of the House

The House of Representatives Procedure Committee is inquiring into the conduct of the business of the House of Representatives. The inquiry will focus on options for sitting hour reform, speaking times for legislation and other debates, the length of time allocated to items of business, and options for managing the competing demands on members’ time posed by chamber duties, party meetings and parliamentary committee meetings.

  • Further information available here


Parliamentary remuneration

Parliamentary Allowances, Benefits and Salaries of Office is a new report by the Parliamentary Library’s Leanne Manthorpe. It looks briefly at benefits and focuses on allowances and salaries, explaining the legislative basis and fixing and linking mechanisms.

  • The report is available here

Also released by the Parliamentary Library is The Annual Allowance for Senators and Members, also written by Leanne Manthorpe, which explains the legislative basis, fixing and linking mechanisms for the allowance.

  • This report available here


Federalism

Australia is the subject of the cover featurein the latest edition of Federations magazine, published by the Forum of Federations: The Global Network on Federalism. The article was written by Anne Twomey, associate professor of law at the University of Sydney.

  • Download the full June–July 2008 edition of Federations here


24 June 2008

Citizenship: the Audit view…

The Democratic Audit of Australia has made a submission to the Woolcott committee reviewing the Citizenship Test. The Audit submission argues that if a test is to be retained it should be an oral one, dealing solely with the rights and responsibilities of being an Australian citizen.


… and the Woolcott view

On ABC Radio’s Sunday Profile program on 15 June the chair of the committee reviewing the Citizenship Test, Richard Woolcott, was asked “Do you personally think that there should be a citizenship test?” to which he replied, “No I don’t…”

  • Read a transcript of the interview, including Mr Woolcott’s criticism of the Becoming an Australian Citizen booklet here


Deductibility inquiry reports

The federal parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters has released its report on Schedule 1 of the Tax Laws Amendment (2008 Measures No1) Bill 2008. The committee, which heard evidence from the Audit’s Graeme Orr, recommends removing the tax deductibility of political donations.

Read the report


Queensland FOI committee reports

Queensland’s FOI Independent Review Panel has released its final report, The Right to Information: Reviewing Queensland’s Freedom of Information Act. The panel, chaired by barrister, author and former journalist, David Solomon, has made 141 recommendations to Premier Anna Bligh. These amount to “not merely an upgrade of the legislation, but a new model … a radically different but more effective legislative architecture for FOI”.

Government information should be released “routinely and proactively” without the need for individual requests. A Right to Information Act should replace the existing legislation. Cabinet material should be accessible unless it compromises collective ministerial responsibility, and released completely after ten years instead of thirty. The Queensland review could be a model for changes in other states and the Commonwealth.


NSW funding committee reports

New South Wales Legislative Council has released its report on Electoral and Political Party Funding in NSW. Among other things, the committee recommends a $1,000 cap on private donations and a ban on corporate donations. “Political donations and election spending would be disclosed in a timely, transparent and accessible manner,” says the report. “There would be greater policing of the electoral funding scheme, and tougher penalties for non-compliance.”


NSW legislation introduced

Meanwhile, the Electoral Funding Amendment (Political Donations and Expenditure) Bill 2008 and the Local Government and Planning Legislation Amendment (Political Donations) Bill 2008 were introduced into the NSW Parliament on 19 June 2008.

  • Read the minister’s second reading speech here


Canada sets a “radical” example

In an article for the Canberra Times, the Audit’s Marian Sawer reports on Canada’s electoral funding reforms and suggests that they have lessons for Australia. The first wave of reform, in 2004, was prompted by the “sponsorship” scandals under the Liberal government of Jean Chrétien. The Conservative government of Stephen Harper went even further in 2006 to remove the influence of corporate money from the electoral process. Still more legislation is currently before the Canadian parliament, designed to close loopholes regarding “loans” to parties and candidates.

  • Read the article here


Participation inquiry

Victoria’s Electoral Matters Committee has commenced an Inquiry Into Voter Participation and Informal Voting. Submissions close on 27 June 2008, and public hearings will be conducted at Parliament House Melbourne on 23 and 24 July 2008.

Regulating lobbying

In this paper Gareth Griffith from the NSW Parliamentary Library discusses the regulation of political lobbyists as at 2 June 2008. Taking a comparative approach, he looks at current and proposed schemes in Australia and in selected overseas jurisdictions and asks: what is the best and most effective regulatory scheme to safeguard and nurture confidence in the democratic system?

  • Read the paper here

 

15 May 2008

Electoral changes go to the Senate

The federal government has today introduced changes to the Electoral Act, covering political donations and election funding, into the Senate.

Senator Faulkner's media release is here.

Lobbyist register goes live

As well, the federal government's lobbyist register website is now up and running, and can be viewed here. The lobbyist register will be fully operational from 1 July. Crikey's Bernard Keane reports today that Senator Andrew Murray “has referred the register to the Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration to consider ways that it could be improved, including the key issue of whether in-house lobbyists should be included, and whether it should be extended to all members of Parliament. However, as a ministerial code rather than a regulation or legislation, the Register requirements are in force, and lobbyists have until 30 June to register themselves.”


Reviewing the 2007 federal election

The Parliamentary Library has released its research paper on the 2007 federal election, written by Scott Bennett and Stephen Barber, which includes a narrative discussion of the election campaign and its outcome and a comprehensive set of statistics.

The report is available here.


Young democratists

The Institute for Social Research at Swinburne is holding the third of its Emerging Scholars' Workshops on the theme of Democracy.

Find out more here.


Donations, disclosure

The Electoral Matters Committee of the Parliament of Victoria is conducting an Inquiry into Political Donations and Disclosure. Submissions close on Friday 27 June 2008.

Details here.


… disputation

The case of the disputed election in the Division of McEwen is set down for hearing in the Federal Court of Australia, Melbourne, in courtroom 8D on 21 and 22 May at 10.15 am


… and more donations

The Australian Electoral Commission has released details of electoral donations from the 2007 federal election. They can be found here.


Undeclared donations…

The NSW Election Funding Authority has asked the Crown Solicitor to prosecute 800 donors who failed to declare $8 million in donations to parties and candidates at the 2006 state election, the Sydney Morning Herald reported on 3 & 4 May 2008.

More details here.


… and deductible donations

The Democratic Audit of Australia supported limited tax deductibility on small political donations in its submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry on Tax Deductibility of Political Donations.

Read the submission here and the transcript of the public hearing held in Canberra on 29 April 2008 here.


No four-year terms for Queensland

"Talks have again broken down between the Bligh Government and the Queensland Opposition over a referendum on fixed four-year terms," reported The Australian on 1 May.

The full item is here

16 April 2008

Electoral green papers

A few days earlier, on 28 March 2008, Senator Faulkner, who is also Special Minister of State, had announced that the government would prepare two Green Papers on electoral reform and will seek the cooperation of the State and Territory Premiers and Chief Ministers in the drafting process. The first paper, to be released in July 2008, will look at disclosure, funding and expenditure issues; the second, to be released in October, will examine a broader range of options aimed at strengthening a range of other elements of electoral law.

  • Read the transcript of Senator Faulkner's media conference here


Funding and disclosure reforms

At the same media conference, Senator Faulkner announced five immediate measures: reducing the campaign donation disclosure threshold level to $1,000, banning donations from overseas or from non-Australian companies, tying election funding to reported and verified electoral expenditure, removing the loophole whereby separate divisions of a political party are treated as separate entities, and increasing public scrutiny of donations by setting six-monthly disclosure timeframes. In an article for the Canberra Times on 7 April, the Audit's Norm Kelly broadly supported the proposals but took issue with the requirement that candidates must verify campaign expenditure in order to trigger public funding.

  • Read Norm Kelly's article here


Federal electoral inquiries underway

The Joint Select Committee on Electoral Matters is currently conducting two inquiries: an inquiry into Schedule 1 of the Tax Laws Amendment (2008 Measures No.1) Bill 2008 - the schedule applying to political contributions and gifts - with a closing date for submissions of 18 April 2008, and an inquiry into the 2007 federal election, with a closing date for submissions of 16 May 2008. The Democratic Audit is making submissions to the both of these inquiries; these will be available soon.


NSW inquiry

The Legislative Council Select Committee on Electoral and Political Party Funding Inquiry has held public hearings and a public forum. Submission 107A outlines the Labor Party's recently announced proposal to ban all private donations to political parties.

  • Submission can be found here


Audit members at the 2020 Summit

Three people associated with the Audit - Marian Sawer, who headed the Audit from 2002-2007 and is now Director, Democratic Audit ANU, and Audit contributors Sarah Maddison, Sally Young and George Williams - will attend the federal government's Australia 2020 Summit late this month. Marian Sawer will chair a session on parliamentary democracy.

  • Summit background papers, prepared by the Summit steering committee in consultation with ministerial co-chairs and their departments, are available here

  • A short Audit paper on political financing prepared for the Summit, is available here


Major parties looking after themselves

In the Sydney Morning Herald on 5 April 2008 Alan Ramsey reported on changed arrangements for federal budget night which will enable the major parties to use Parliament House facilities for fund raising.

  • Read the article here


North American electoral reforms

On 11 April 2008 on ABC Radio National's The National Interest, Peter Mares interviewed Amy Loprest, Executive Director of the New York City Campaign Finance Board, on its regime of in-time disclosure of political donations and to Professor Fred Fletcher of York University on Canada's new political donation and expenditure laws.


UK looks to Australia (among others)

In January Britain's Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, the Rt Hon Jack Straw, issued the report, Review of Voting Systems, which considers the various voting systems used in the UK and a selection of those of other countries, including Australia's system of preferential voting. The Guardian reported that Michael Wills, the constitutional affairs minister, praised the alternative vote system - what Australian call preferential voting - at a meeting on electoral reform last month. "The alternative vote has many attractions," he said, "including the fact that you have to get 50% plus one in that constituency, therefore you have a greater legitimacy."

  • Read the report here


Election timetable updated

The Parliamentary Library's occasional publication Australian Elections Timetable has been updated. The paper lists the dates of the next Commonwealth, state and territory elections, where they are fixed, or gives the earliest and latest possible dates on which they may occur.

  • Read Australian Elections Timetable here

 

 

19 March 2008

Democratic Audit submission to NSW inquiry

The Audit has made a submission to the NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into Electoral and Political Party Funding, highlighting three issues: the relationship between funding regimes; the timeliness of donation disclosures; and the structure of the Election Funding Authority.

  • Read the full submission here


Colin Hughes on political funding

The former Electoral Commissioner, Professor Colin A. Hughes, has told the NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into Electoral and Political Party Funding that “[t]he essential components for an election finance system without which the system must be suspect are, first, machinery to enforce, monitor and recommend, and second, continuous, comprehensive and total disclosure of both income and outgo. All else is bells and whistles.”

  • Read the full Hughes submission here
  • Visit the inquiry’s webpage here


JSCEM members announced

The membership of the federal parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) has been finalised: the chair is Labor’s Daryl Melham MP and the deputy chair is Liberal MP Scott Morrison.

  • A full membership list is here


McEwen goes to the Federal Court

The contested result in the federal division of McEwen is set down for a directions hearing in the Federal Court of Australia (Melbourne) on 28 March 2008, before Justice Tracey.


Foreign political donations

In this briefing note Senator Andrew Murray argues that Australia – like countries including the United States, New Zealand, Canada and the United Kingdom – should ban foreign donations to domestic political parties to stop foreign influence in domestic political affairs.

  • Read this paper here


Dear Minister, ignore public service experience at your peril

Writing in the Public Sector Informant supplement to the Canberra Times, Patrick Weller argues that the public service prospers when it is well led by ministers who know what they want and how to use the skills of the public servants who work with them.

  • Read page 1 of this article here
  • and page 2 here


Politics/Media Conference proceedings

Convened by the Media and Communications Program, University of Melbourne, on 12–13 February 2008, this conference brought together researchers and practitioners in Australian politics, media and political communication. Conference papers covered political reporting from both a research and practitioner point of view, with a number focusing on the 2007 federal election campaign and others taking a broader view of political communications in both theory and practice. The full text of most papers in available at The Soapbox, an elections database established by the Media and Communications Program.

  • Find the papers here


Will the latest aNiMaLS be CUTSies or go CaCTUS?

In 1996 the infamous National Media Liaison Service (known as “aNiMaLS”) became the equally infamous Government Members’ Secretariat. Will the Rudd government’s Caucus Committee Support and Training Unit perform the same role, asks Mark Davis in the Sydney Morning Herald on 25 February 2008. Not so, says Senator Robert Ray: there will be “no media monitoring; no research on the Opposition; no direct campaigning in elections and the like…”

  • Read Mark Davis’s article here


Branch stacks and smokestacks

Linton Besser, writing in the Sydney Morning Herald on 8 March 2008, reveals branch stacking to influence candidate pre-selection has played a roll in the troubles besetting the Wollongong City Council.

  • Read the full article here


The Everyday Democracy Index

Demos in the UK has developed this index as “a tool for assessing the democratic health of European countries across many different dimensions”. According to a paper launched on 31 January, everryday democracy “includes not just formal dimensions of democracy but also more everyday features of democracy – how important democratic principles and practices are to the cultures of workplaces, to people’s community life, to the way they interact with public services, and even to the way they talk to their friends and family.”

  • Read the full report here

 

 

18 February 2008

NSW elections database

Antony Green has produced an excellent database of NSW Legislative Assembly election results dating back to 1856 (the first general election under responsible government). Produced for the NSW parliament, the information includes seat by seat results for every election and by-election, an alphabetical listing of every candidate that has ever stood in NSW (listing all contests each candidate has stood in). Very easy to navigate around, this is not only a valuable research tool for election nerds, but a useful reference point for anyone with an interest in the history of NSW politics.

  • Access the database here.


NSW 2007 election inquiry

The NSW parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters is currently conducting an inquiry into the conduct of the 2007 general election. The deadline for submissions is 29 February.

  • For information on making a submission, visit the Committee’s web site here.


Political finance – Call for restrictions on donations

In a recent opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald, David Humphries argues that Australia should follow the Canadian example by putting limits on the size of political donations, and prohibiting foreign donations. It should be pointed out that there is a small error in the piece – Canada now prohibits all donations from corporations and trade unions. Only donations of less than $1 000 from individuals are now allowed.

  • Read David Humphries’ article here.


Pace-setting FOI Discussion Paper from Queensland

One of the first actions of the new Queensland Premier, Anna Bligh, was to commission Dr David Solomon to head a review of Queensland's Freedom of Information Act. Its Discussion Paper has now been released (30 January 2008) and suggests fundamental changes. These are relevant beyond Queensland and, for example, would help repair the notoriously weak Commonwealth FOI Act.

The Queensland discussion paper refers approvingly to the principle underlying the New Zealand approach to FOI, where the default position is to release even Cabinet documents unless it can be shown this would damage the public interest. It suggests all FOI exemptions in the Queensland Act be subject to an over-riding public interest test. At the federal level the Rudd Government is so far only committed to removal of conclusive certificates and the setting up of a FOI Commissioner, not to reducing currently exempt areas or introducing an over-riding public interest test.

  • For the Discussion Paper (Enhancing Open and Accountable Government) click here. Submissions to the review close on Friday 7 March.
  • For Jack Waterford's analysis in The Public Sector Informant (February 2008) [scanned 300kb PDF] click here.


Civil unions – Self-government for the ACT?

The ACT Attorney-General, Simon Corbell, has called for the removal of the provision in the Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 that gives the Governor General (i.e., the Commonwealth government) the power to disallow laws passed by the Territory Assembly. This is what happened to the Civil Unions Act 2006. The Howard Government objected to the Civil Unions Act on the grounds that it equated civil unions with marriage and would have authorised marriage celebrants to conduct civil union ceremonies.

Following the Governor-General's disallowance of the 2006 ACT legislation, Labor, Green and Democrat Senators (Ludwig, Nettle and Stott Despoja) moved a motion in the Senate to disallow the Governor-General's action and were joined by ACT Liberal Senator Gary Humphries. The motion was defeated, however, when the Family First Senator sided with the Government.

After the change of federal government a new Civil Partnership Bill was presented to the ACT Legislative Assembly in December 2007. The Bill creates 'civil partnership notaries' to witness the declarations of those entering into formal domestic partnerships and provides the opportunity for this to be a public ceremony. This change of language, from the celebrants referred to in the 2006 Act, was intended to underline that a civil partnership was different from marriage. The Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, said that his government would not over-ride the legislation as it was a matter for States and Territories.

In 2008, however, the Commonwealth Attorney-General, Robert McLelland, has repeatedly claimed the public ceremony aspects of the ACT Bill are 'unacceptable'. His preference is for relationships registers that do not involve a ceremony before an official. Hence the ACT Attorney-General's statement that existing provisions allowing the Commonwealth to over-ride Territory legislation are undemocratic and should be abolished.

Unfortunately the ACT seems to have little pull in the federal parliament, having no representation in the Cabinet or Ministry and ACT votes being worth less than votes in any other jurisdiction in House of Representatives elections.

  • For a comprehensive assessment on the proposal for civil unions in the ACT, including the various political forces at play, read this article from Carol Johnson (University of Adelaide) at On Line Opinion.

20 December 2007

Audit to move to Swinburne

We are pleased to announce that the Democratic Audit of Australia has found a new administrative home, at the Institute for Social Research at Swinburne University.

A new team, including Professor Brian Costar, Professor Denise Meredyth and Peter Browne, will take responsibility for continuing the initiative throughout 2008 and for developing the next phase of the research, in partnership with ANU, with other Australian universities and with international collaborators.

The ISR already hosts the Chair in Victorian State Parliamentary Democracy, held by Brian Costar. Research at the ISR ranges across public policy areas: from electoral reform and civic participation to immigration and refugee policy, media and communications, information poverty, social housing and sustainability. ISR has established research partnerships with the Parliament of Victoria, with local and state government agencies and with a variety of not for profit agencies. Its publication initiatives include hosting Australian Policy Online and Creative Economy, as well as editorship of the Briefings book series published by UNSW Press.

The Democratic Audit will continue in 2008 as a partnership between the ANU and Swinburne. Federation Press will be publishing Australia: The State of Democracy, the capstone book prepared by Norman Abjorensen, Phil Larkin and Marian Sawer. Marketing Government by Kathy MacDermott (Audit Report No. 10) will also be published from the ANU. Swinburne will be taking over the publication of regular Updates on democratic developments and the organisation of a national workshop on electoral reform.

The team from Swinburne meeting with the ANU Audit team on 14 December 2007 to discuss the future of the Audit.
L to R, Peter Browne (Swinburne), Brian Costar (Swinburne), Klaus Neumann (Swinburne) Norm Kelly (ANU) Denise Meredyth (Swinburne) Marian Sawer (ANU), Peter Brent (ANU), Norman Abjorensen (ANU)

Open larger picture


2007 federal election – public funding payments

The AEC has released details of public funding payments for the 2007 election, made to all parties and candidates who received at least 4 per cent of the vote.  Funding is currently paid at $2.10 per vote.  Of the total $46.5m payments, Labor received $20.9m, the Coalition parties $20.5m, and the Greens $4.1m.

NSW political funding – submissions called

The NSW Select Committee on Electoral and Political Party Funding is calling for submissions to its inquiry.  Issues include public funding, donation limits and disclosure, and the Election Funding Authority.  Submissions close Friday, 15th February 2008.

  • Articles by Lee Rhiannon and Norman Thompson on political donations – On Line Opinion - CPD

Senate practices – Calls for change

In the lead-up to the federal election, Civil Liberties Australia called for reforms to Senate practices, on matters such as timeframes for committee inquiry processes, the balance of committee membership, the use of the gag for debates, and question time. 

The Australian Democrats have also put forward an agenda of procedural and institutional reforms of Senate practice.  Procedural reforms include – committees being able to initiate legislation; a minimum 21 days for committees to consider Bills; and for there to be at least 28 questions during question time.  Institutional reforms proposed include – judicial appointments to be based on publicly-disclosed consultation and merit selection processes; international treaties only to be ratified after parliamentary scrutiny; and development grants schemes (such as the Regional Partnerships Program) to be administered by impartial authorities.     


Accountability Watch

The Centre for Policy Development is maintaining an accountability watch on labor’s federal election commitments on issues related to democracy.  Also contains useful links to various reports.

  • Australian Democracy – A User’s Guide

    29 November 2007

    Federal election 24 November 2007

    On Saturday the Labor Party, led by Kevin Rudd, defeated the John Howard-led Coalition government.

    The Democratic Audit snapped photos at several polling booths.

    23 November 2007

    ANAO: Regional spending program ‘political’

    A report by Auditor-General on the first three years of the Federal Government’s Regional Partnerships Program (2003-06) has found it to have ‘fallen short of an acceptable standard of public administration’. There has been much comment in the media and elsewhere on the use of the program for pork-barreling in the 2004 election. The Auditor-General’s report expresses concern that decisions were taken to fund certain projects not recommended by the department, and that some decisions ‘were open to the interpretation that they had been made for political reasons and not on the merits of the project’.

     Further politicisation of the public service

    The Canberra Times reports that public servants have been compiling ‘cheat sheets’—breaking down government expenditure by federal electorate—for government MPs and candidates to use in the election campaign. The information compiled by public servants was not passed on to the parliamentary library and FOI requests have been blocked by extortionate charges quoted for scrutiny of the expenditure breakdowns. Together, Education, Communications, Defence and Family and Community Services wanted more than $50 000 to release the documents, estimating it would take thousands of hours to scrutinise the documents. The Canberra Times notes that the self-imposed regime of scrutinising the documents line-by-line has enabled agencies to ride out the election without disclosing further evidence of pork barrelling.

    Read the Canberra Times here and here.

    Former PMs criticise ‘culture of secrecy’

    Former prime ministers Malcolm Fraser and Gough Whitlam have written an open letter on the decline of responsible government and the failure to observe the principle of ministerial accountability. They have urged the winners of the November 2007 general election to launch a full, independent inquiry.

    Relating to the former PMs' open letter, Spencer Zifcak and Victor Perton have an article in the Australian calling for a revamped code of ministerial accountability, as recommended in the Australasian Study of Parliament's Be honest, minister!

     How should I vote?

    GetUp has an online questionnaire designed to find the candidate who most closely matches your opinions. Candidates in all electorates answered 20 questions and their responses were recorded. You answer the same questions and your answers are matched with the candidates standing in your electorate. A personal How To Vote card is then generated. It's good fun and the site has been independently checked for fairness, though not all candidates have answered the questionnaire.

     Australian democracy special edition

    In the wake of the Federal election, the Centre for Policy Development is publishing a special edition of InSight, its online journal, on the state of Australia’s democracy. It is to be published on 28 November 2007.

    ASIO criticised

    The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) have been roundly criticised by a judge for their conduct, including false imprisonment and kidnap, in bringing terrorism charges against a Sydney medical student.

    MPs’ activity

    The Daily Telegraph has audited the activity of members of the House of Representatives. It finds that members who are stepping down are generally less active and hard-working than those standing for re-election and that coalition members in marginal seats are more likely to ask ‘Dorothy Dixers’ at Question Time.

    Tightening up the New Zealand political finance regime

    The Justice and Electoral Committee of the New Zealand parliament has just reported back on the Electoral Finance Bill. The Bill is intended to close loopholes revealed in the last election when the Exclusive Brethren was the third largest known spender.

    Accountability failings in Canada

    The regulations to govern lobbyists under Canada’s much publicised Federal Accountability Act have still not come into force, although the Act received royal assent in December 2006. The party launched its bid for government at the last election with a strong commitment to closing the 'revolving door' between lobbyists and government.

    Despite promises, little has been done to curb the power of lobbyists, and now Prime Minister Harper has come under fire over the appointment of the head of an industry lobby group, the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association, to lead the Conservative research bureau.

    Audit contributor Katherine Gelber (UNSW) and Adrienne Stone (University of Melbourne) have edited a collection on the laws governing hate speech.

    • More details are available here

     

    19 October 2007

    Australian electoral management bodies' independence

    Australia is at the forefront of professional and independent electoral administration, especially when assessed in international comparative studies. However, while there is often debate about the levels of fairness provided by the various electoral systems in use throughout Australia, less scrutiny has been applied to the electoral management bodies charged with administering these systems.

    • Read a paper given to the Australasian Political Studies Association last month by the Audit's Norm Kelly, here.

    The close of the electoral roll

    At 8pm on Wednesday 17 October 2007, the commonwealth electoral roll closed for enrolments and re-enrolments. Electors already on the roll but who want to change their address have until the evening of Tuesday 23 October to get their forms to the Australian Electoral Commission. You can check your current enrolled address here and obtain a form here. Note, however, that it is now too late for people who are not on the roll to register.

    When the federal government legislated last year to close the rolls for new enrolments on the day the writs were issued, and for re-enrolments three days afterwards, it justified the change on the grounds that the week’s grace that had previously existed had put unwanted stress on the AEC’s operations. The Commissioner agreed that it would ‘make our life easier’. It is not clear, therefore, whether the AEC welcomed the three day window that resulted from the Prime Minister issuing the writs three days after announcing the election in 2007.

    However, after the election was announced the AEC advertised widely the Wednesday evening deadline, and the Sydney Morning Herald has reported a last minute ‘steady stream’ of first-time voters enrolling at the AEC’s Sydney office.

    Also on the subject of the electoral roll, Simon Jackman, who co-authored an Audit paper with Peter Brent in June has an update at The Bulletin’s website.

    Jackman and Brent for the Audit.

    Blogger William Bowe looked at the issue in Crikey this week.

    As did the Sydney Morning Herald

    and the Canberra Times.

    We will have to wait until after the election to determine how well the AEC coped under the new conditions


    Party donations

    In the wake of the prime minister’s admission that he would welcome donations to the Liberal Party from Gunns, the company behind the proposed Tasmanian pulp mill, Ken Coghill (Monash University) has a piece on the ABC’s website on the shortcomings of the regulation of political finance in Australia.


    Labor commitment to fixed terms

    ALP leader Kevin Rudd has committed his party to a referendum on the introduction of four-year, fixed-term governments.


    Kirby calls for dissenting judiciary

    Justice Michael Kirby has criticised the conservatism of his fellow High Court judges in the annual Hawke Lecture. Whilst government is inevitably constrained to a degree by the need for consensus and compromise, he argues the independence of the judiciary should see them dissenting from majority opinion in order for social progress to be achieved.

    The transcript and a recording of the speech are available here.

    Campaign poster ban in NSW?

    An apparently innocuous piece of legislation currently before the New South Wales parliament could have important election campaigning implications, especially for small parties and Independents. The Electricity Supply Amendment (Offences) Bill 2007 makes it an offence to enter or climb electricity works and this, it seems, would include putting up campaign posters on electricity poles. Lacking the resources of the big parties, smaller parties and independents rely on this sort of free campaigning so the bill could further skew the electoral process against them.

    The bill is available here.


    Another Bill of Rights?

    Following a community consultation process, the Tasmanian Law Reform Institute has recommended that Tasmania become the latest jurisdiction in Australia to enact a Bill of Rights. Australia remains the only comparable country without a Bill of Rights, though the ACT and Victoria have both introduced them.

    A summary of the Institute’s recommendations is available here.

    The full report is available here.


    Democracy in Pacific Asia

    Roland Rich, the former head of the ANU’s Centre for Democratic Institutions and recently appointed executive head of the United Nations Democracy Fund, has a new book examining democracy in Pacific Asia.

    It is available from Amazon.

    20 September 2007

    Queensland and Victoria move on FOI reform

    The practice of Queensland governments taking documents to cabinet meetings to keep them secret will be restricted following a review of the State's Freedom of Information laws. David Solomon, who heads the committee established by new Queensland Premier Anna Bligh to overhaul the laws, has identified the cabinet secrecy provisions as a target for reform.

    "It isn't good enough for documents to be able to be wheeled into cabinet without any rules to keep them from the public eye," he said.

    The move follows an initiative by another new premier, John Brumby, to strengthen Victoria's FOI regime.


    Queensland premier resigns

    Peter Beattie became the third Labor premier to voluntarily step down in the last two years, when he announced his resignation on August 10 2007. He stated exhaustion as the reason for giving up the job after almost 10 years. His deputy, Anna Bligh was elected unopposed as his successor.


    The Attorney-General on a bill of rights

    The Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock had a piece in the Sydney Morning Herald arguing against an Australian bill of rights. Australia is the only Western democracy without a bill of rights or its equivalent, though the ACT and Victoria have now taken this step and Western Australia is consulting on a draft bill. The Auditor-General argues that a bill of rights will not ensure rights are respected and moves power from elected government to an unelected judiciary.


    High Court overturns prisoner vote ban

    A High Court ruling has overturned the measure contained in the 2006 Electoral Amendment Act to remove prisoners’ right to vote. Following an appeal by a woman prisoner serving a sentence in Victoria, the High Court overturned the ban. The Court did maintain earlier legislation imposing a ban on prisoners serving sentences of over three years.


    Access card legislation could be delayed

    Legislation to introduce a national access card could be delayed until after the upcoming federal election. The bill was put on hold after a Senate committee warned that the smart card was likely to become a de facto identity card, and critics have rung alarm bells about the privacy implications.

    30 August 2007

    Prisoner voting ban overturned

    The High Court today (30 August 2007) overturned last year's amendment to the Commonwealth Electoral Act taking the vote away from all prisoners. Prisoner Vicky Lee Roach successfully appealed against the ban. The Court has reaffirmed the previous ban applying to prisoners serving a sentence of three or more years.

    29 August 2007

    The accessibility of administrative justice

    The Queensland parliament’s Legal, Constitutional and Administrative Review Committee has picked up the inquiry on the accessibility of administrative justice initiated but not completed in the last parliament, broadening the original terms of reference. The deadline for submissions is 28 September 2007. Full details of the inquiry can be found here.


    Due process in Queensland local government mergers?

    In the wake of the Northern Territory Emergency Bill, it seems it is not just the federal government that is keen to push legislation through without due process. The Queensland government has pushed through legislation dramatically reducing the number of local authorities and councillors with only one day of parliamentary debate. An amendment sacking any council that held a local ballot on the proposed mergers was also introduced. The State government subsequently backed down on the amendment  after the Federal government threatened to intervene and fund the plebiscites; a Senate committee inquiry has been launched to investigate the matter.

    The details of the Senate inquiry are here.

    Read more in The Age.


    Government questions polling integrity

    The federal government has responded to continued poor opinion polling by questioning the integrity of the one of the polling companies. This emerged as a result of the involvement of a senior member of polling firm IPSOS in fundraising for ALP candidate for Bennelong, Maxine McKew. Whilst the integrity of opinion polling is important, it should be noted that the government has been getting poor results in polls by companies where no ALP connection has been found!

    Read more in the Australian


    Be honest, Minister!’ Restoring faith in government in Australia

    At the request of the authors, we are making the report of the Australasian Study of Parliament (ASPG) Accountability Working, ‘Be honest, Minister!’ Restoring faith in government in Australia, available on the Audit website. The report recommends strengthening the code of ministerial responsibility, strengthening FOI, regulating lobbying, establishing a Parliamentary Standards Commissioner and moving towards the independence of Presiding Officers.

    Read it here

    16 August 2007

    Peter Andren

    Peter Andren, the Independent MP for Calare, has announced that cancer has forced him to withdraw from his campaign for a Senate seat. He has been a strong campaigner for democratic integrity as well as a supporter of the Audit. We send him our very best wishes for his recovery.

    Victorian premier resigns

    After eight years in office, Victorian premier Steve Bracks stepped down on 30 July 2007. His contribution to restoring democratic practice in the State, including entrenching the independence of the Auditor-general and of the Director of Public Prosecutions, is discussed in this article by Joseph O'Reilly in New Matilda:

    Open government in Victoria

    The new premier of Victoria, John Brumby, has announced measures to increase government transparency. They include:

    • Prioritising new legislation to reform the FOI Act;
    • Releasing an annual Statement of Legislative Intent from 2008;
    • Funding live web-casting of all sessions of the Legislative Assembly and Council—including question time;
    • Releasing quarterly reports that detail the costs and benefits of all Ministerial overseas travel;
    • Publicising the remuneration band and identity of members of Government boards and advisory committees; and
    • Posting transcripts of the Premier’s media conferences on his website www.premier.vic.gov.au  as soon as they become available.

    The media release is here

    Lack of good process over NT legislation

    The federal government introduced the legislation covering its intervention in NT Aboriginal communities (Northern Territory National Emergency Response Bill 2007 & Related Bills) on 7 August 2007. The Bills amounted to over 500 pages but were only made available the day before debate began in the House of Representatives. They were swiftly passed, despite numerous concerns being identified, and were sent on to the Senate. The Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee was able to hold one day of public hearings on Friday before being required to report on Monday 13 August. This hardly amounts to proper legislative scrutiny and review!.

    Launch of Right to Know Campaign

    A coalition of media organisations has launched Australia's Right To Know campaign in response to a tightening of the operating environment for media organisations and journalists. The coalition includes News Limited, the ABC, Fairfax, the SBS, and AAP.

    The campaign's aim is to draw public attention to the growing restrictions on journalists and free speech in Australia. First priority of the campaign is to commission an independent study of threats to free speech and expression in this country.

    The campaign’s joint statement is here

    New Sex Discrimination Commissioner named

    The Federal Government has announced a senior lawyer will take on the role of Sex Discrimination Commissioner, which has been vacant since Pru Goward was elected to the NSW parliament. Elizabeth Broderick is a businesswoman and partner at the law firm Blake Dawson Waldron and will take up the five-year appointment next month. The Attorney-General says Ms Broderick has been an advocate for women and championed flexible work arrangements:

    Save the Senate

    Two hundred and fifty people turned up for the 'Save the Senate' forum hosted by GetUp! in Canberra on 9 August 2007. Clerk of the Senate Harry Evans said that proper legislative scrutiny was in the interests of government as well as the people and helped save governments from policy failures.

    ALP to cut incumbency perks

    In his National Press Club Address on 8 August 2007, Shadow Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner said that a Labor government will reduce the amount of public money being diverted to electioneering. Labor will cut MPs’ printing allowances by one third and ministerial staff numbers by 30 per cent, as well as abolishing the Government Communications Unit.

    Read the full speech here

    Senate Watch

    The Australian Democrats have been maintaining a watch over the government’s use of the Senate since it gained its narrow majority. They have published data covering the period before and since the government gained control, showing: the reduction in sitting days; the fall in amendments accepted (from 42 per cent to 1 per cent); the failure to agree to any orders for the production of documents; the increased rejection of references to committees; and the increased use of the guillotine to curtail debate.

    US Senate tightens lobbying rules

    The US Senate has voted to tighten the rules governing lobbying. The bill, which still has to be signed by the President (who, reportedly, has serious concerns about it), requires disclosure of ‘earmarks’ (special funds for specific projects slipped into spending bills), outlaws pensions to politicians convicted of bribery, requires disclosure of campaign donations that have been raised by lobbyists, and bars former Senators from lobbying Congress for two years after leaving office.

    e-voting concerns in the UK

    The UK Electoral Commission has called for an end to trials of e-voting and phone voting until security measures have been improved. Thirteen pilots were held during the May 2007 local government elections, which revealed a number of technical problems.

    Kiefel appointed to the High Court

    The number of women serving as High Court judges has risen to two with the appointment of Susan Kiefel. She becomes only the third woman Justice on the High Court since it was established in 1903. Women constitute four of the nine justices on the Canadian Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin.

    Multiculturalism, human rights and democracy

    The Human Rights and Equal Opportunities (HREOC) and the Sydney Democracy Forum are hosting a forum to examine the state of multiculturalism in Australia.

    The event will be between 2.30 and 5.00 on Friday 17 August 2007, in the Metcalfe Auditorium, State Library of NSW, Macquarie Street, Sydney.

    RSVP to lizhou@humanrights.gov.au 

    Public Policy Network annual conference

    The annual National Public Policy Network Conference will be held on the Sunshine Coast on 31 January – 1 February 2008. The conference is being jointly organised by the University of the Sunshine Coast and the University of Southern Queensland, and will involve academics from around Australia and internationally.

    3 August 2007

    Government responses to committees

    The latest six-monthly report on government responses to committee reports was presented to parliament on 21 June 2007. Astonishingly, it would appear that the government has failed to respond to a single report within the required three-month period. Indeed, some are still awaiting a response after several years. Whilst in a few cases the government claims a response is pending, subject to developments, in the case of the report on A Certain Maritime Incident (tabled in October 2002), the government  is still deciding whether it is going to respond at all. Perhaps the most worrying thing is not that the government is reluctant to respond to reports, but that parliament allows this.

    The full reports can be found in Hansard:

    British votes to decide key Australian seats?

    A government response to a question on notice from Sen Andrew Murray has revealed that there are still some 163,887 voters on the electoral roll who are not Australian citizens. British subjects who were on the roll in January 1984 were allowed to stay on it indefinitely, unlike the situation in Canada where Canadian citizenship was required from 1975. The Australian High Court determined in 1999 that the UK was a ‘foreign power’, making British citizens ineligible to sit in the Australian parliament because of their foreign allegiance. British citizens can still, however, decide elections in federal seats such as Brand and Canning in WA and Kingston and Wakefield in SA.

    Same-Sex: Same Entitlements

    The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission released its report Same-Sex: Same Entitlements on 22 June 2007. This reports on the inquiry into discrimination against same-sex couples in accessing financial and work-related entitlements. HREOC found that 58 federal laws discriminated against same-sex couples, including areas such as superannuation, Medicare and child support. While same-sex couples were 'first-class tax-payers’ they were second-class citizens in terms of entitlements and this also meant a discriminatory impact on their children.' This was the inquiry that Howard government ministers instructed their departments and agencies not to make submissions to.

    NSW Election Funding Inquiry

    The NSW Legislative Council has set up (27 June) a select committee to inquire into the funding and disclosure of donations to political parties and candidates in State and local government elections. The inquiry was moved by Liberal MP Don Harwin, with the support of the Greens, the Shooters Party and the Christian Democratic Party.  The inquiry will look at the impact of donations on the democratic process and the advantages and disadvantages of a ban on corporate and union donations and of introducing expenditure limits. It will report by the first sitting day in March 2008. There has been continuing controversy in NSW over developer donations and their potential impact on planning laws and planning decisions.

    Parliamentary administration compared

    June Verrier, currently a visiting fellow at the Audit has an interesting paper on parliamentary administration in the Australasian Parliamentary Review Vol.22(1), Autumn. Comparing experience in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the UK, she argues that, contrary to much opinion, improved corporate governance will not, of itself, increase parliament’s independence or effectiveness. An underpinning commitment is necessary to the kind of administrative and budgetary arrangements needed for independence, the best-practice model being a cross-party parliamentary commission.

    Government communication in Australia

    Audit contributor, Sally Young (University of Melbourne) has published a timely edited collection on Government Communication in Australia (Cambridge Univ. Press). The book covers issues including how governments use spin, new media and expensive government advertising to influence reporting and public opinion. It includes chapters by other Audit contributors including Graeme Orr, Brian Head, Peter Chen, Rachel Gibson, Sarah Maddison and Katherine Gelber.

    The pillars of power

    Audit contributor David Solomon AM (University of Queensland), has published The Pillars of Power (Federation Press). The book examines changes in Australian political, legal and regulatory institutions, including the growth in prime ministerial power, the downgrading of parliament and the remaking of the federal system. It draws on 50 interviews with politicians, administrators and other observers.

    27 July 2007

    WA boundary changes

    The Western Australian Electoral Distribution Commissioners have released their proposed new electoral boundaries on 29 June, following a period of public comment—these proposed boundaries are the first under WA’s one vote, one value legislation. The Commissioners’ web site contains the various maps, submissions, and process timeline. Objections to the proposed boundaries need to be submitted to the Commissioners by 30 July, with the final boundaries being published on 29 October 2007.

    20 June 2007

    Human rights for WA

    The Western Australian Government has released a draft Human Rights Bill that draws on both the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) and the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities 2006. A consultative committee chaired by former Fraser Government Minister Fred Chaney has called for submissions by 31 August 2007. Australia remains the only western democracy without a national Bill of Rights but action is at least proceeding at the sub-national level.

    • Click here for more information, including a discussion paper and the draft bill.

    Prisoner disenfranchisement

    The Roach Constitutional challenge to prisoner disenfranchisement (Roach v Electoral Commissioner & Anor) is being heard in the High Court in Canberra.

    Brian Costar, Professor at Swinburne University, spoke for five minutes on an episode of Perspective on Radio National on 4 June 2007 about it.

    Fundraising at Kirribilli

    Revelations that Prime Minister John Howard has been using official residences, Kirribilli House and The Lodge, to host Liberal Party events has sparked controversy. The Australian Electoral Commission has ruled that the rent-free use of Kirribilli House by the Liberal Party did not constitute a 'gift' that should have been disclosed under electoral rules.


    Tightening the rules for voters

    The Audit’s Norm Kelly and Audit adviser Colin Hughes (Emeritus Professor of Politics, University of Queensland and former federal Electoral Commissioner) were both interviewed for Radio National’s Law Report on 12 June 2007 on the changes to federal enrolment requirements. The Government has claimed that the changes are necessary to ensure the integrity of the electoral roll. But that integrity was not seriously in question before the changes and the new provisions are likely to deny the vote to tens of thousands of otherwise eligible Australians.

    • Read or listen here

    Offices of profit?

    Audit contributor Peter van Onselen has published an opinion piece on the lack of rules in Australia governing the employment of ministers once they leave office. The latest example is Ian Campbell who has been appointed to the board of a company expected to tender for the smart card contract he had carriage of as minister. Canada, the UK and the US all have rules governing post-separation employment to prevent such conflicts of interest.


    Independent Electoral Commission for Ireland

    Following the Irish election Fianna Fail has negotiated an agreement with the Greens to enter a coalition government led by Fianna Fail and also including the Progressive Democrats. Apart from provisions for new climate change initiatives, the agreement includes the creation of a new independent electoral commission with responsibility for electoral administration and the creation of a new electoral register. The electoral commission will also take over responsibilities in relation to electoral expenditure from the Commission on Standards in Public Life.


    Sydney Democratic Deficit event

    The Sydney Democracy Forum is holding an event on the Democratic Deficit and Australia. The event will explore Australia's democratic deficit and some novel ways for strengthening our democracy. Its three presenters are Dr Lyn Carson (University of Sydney), Dr Phil Larkin (Democratic Audit of Australia, Australian National University) and Professor Murray Print (University of Sydney).

    This is a free event, which is open to SDF members and all other interested persons. For catering purposes RSVPs are required and should be sent to the SDF Program Coordinator (r.mueller@econ.usyd.edu.au or (02) 9036 5248) by Friday 22 June.

    More information on the Forum and on this even can be found here.

    29 May 2007

    Amnesty International's 2007 report critical of Australia

    Amnesty International(AI) has published its report on the state of the world's human rights in 2007. The Australian government is one of the ones singled out for criticism for adopting ‘the politics of fear’ in relation to asylum seekers. In addition to its refugee policies, violence against women and the counter-terrorism measures were areas highlighted as concerns.

    Freedom of the Australian press

    The Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance has published its 2007 Report on Press Freedom. Disturbingly, the report finds that: ‘A creeping authoritarianism has been the hallmark of the past 12 months in the Australian press. Government and the courts continue to restrict what journalists can report and where they can go, criminalising the media’s professional obligations and wielding ever-greater unchecked power’.

    Webscrubbing

    New Matilda has an article on the way in which governments around the world are using their websites to rewrite history—or ‘webscrubbing’. Whilst the internet has allowed instant access to a vast amount of information, it also allows governments (and companies) retrospectively to edit embarrassing information from their websites and out of public view.

    Investigation of public service and ministerial staff in Canada

    The Canadian Public Service Commission has launched an inquiry into the movement of public servants between departments and ministerial offices and, in particular,  the possible impact on the impartiality—both real and perceived—of the public service. The inquiry follows the Commission’s investigations into two incidents where ministerial offices tried to influence the public service appointments process. Writing in the Public Sector Informant (May 2007), Jack Waterford highlights the relevance of the inquiry to Australia. Here  restrictions on the post-separation employment of public officeholders are less stringent than in Canada, with the onus placed squarely on the individual to avoid conflicts of interest or the taking of ‘improper advantage’ of their previous position.

    Prisoner challenges disenfranchisement

    Vickie Lee Roach, an inmate of the Dame Phyllis Frost Women’s Prison in Victoria has mounted a legal challenge to the government’s 2006 decision to remove prisoners’ right to vote. The challenge is on the basis that, under the Constitution, a citizen can only be disenfranchised on the grounds of mental capacity.

    Government advertising

    Following the controversy over the publicly-funded advertising campaign in support of its WorkChoices proposals, the federal government has launched another campaign—this time for its ‘fairness test—that can be criticised for the same sort of abuse of public funds for party-political ends. With a Bill still some time off, full-page advertisements have already begun to appear in the press in the context of the forthcoming federal election.
    Audit contributor

    • Graeme Orr and Joo-Cheong Tham have a piece in the Age on it

    US electoral administration

    Eight US States are allowing electoral registration up to, and including, election day itself. The move has seen turn out rise, and no apparent problems with fraudulent registration. The latter was the justification for the 2006 changes to electoral registration in Australia, which will, it has been predicted, disenfranchise tens of thousands of voters.

    Less encouragingly, the six-member Federal Election Commission, the body responsible for overseeing US campaign finance laws, is entering the presidential election season with three temporary members whose appointments have not been ratified, two members whose terms have expired but who have not been replaced, and one vacancy. The appointments process is likely to bog down in controversy, both partisan and across party lines, on issues like restrictions on campaign expenditure.

    Charter of rights for Australia

    George Williams, Professor of Law at UNSW and a member of the Audit’s Academic Advisory Committee, has published an updated version of his book, A Charter of Rights for Australia. Australia is alone amongst democracies in having no national bill of rights: Williams argues that the matter has become more urgent in recent years.

    Law and liberty in the war on terror

    The Gilbert and Tobin Centre of Public Law at UNSW is hosting a symposium on Law & Liberty in the War on Terror. The event is on the 4, 5, and 6 July 2007 at UNSW. Speakers include the Attorney-General Philip Ruddock MP.

    Human rights conference

    The Law School at the University of Melbourne is hosting a conference ‘Protecting Human Rights’ on 25 September 2007.

    29 March 2007

    NSW election 24 March 2007

    The Iemma Labor government was returned in the NSW State election, but in an interesting development almost a third of the Legislative Council vote was for minor parties or Independents.

    The Democratic Audit snapped photos at two polling booths

    An Independent Speaker for NSW Parliament

    An interesting development of the election is that Premier Morris Iemma has reportedly given the post of Speaker of the Legislative Assembly to the Independent member for Northern Tablelands, Richard Torbay. The Speaker is supposed to be impartial in overseeing the conduct of parliamentary business and so appointing an Independent should bolster this impartiality.

    Commonwealth whistleblower found guilty

    On 27 March a former Customs officer was found guilty of leaking information about flaws in security at Sydney airport and faces up to two years in prison. The leaked information was published in the Australian and led to a major upgrade in security. The Australian has commented that public servants who leak information about flawed public administration deserve medals not criminal convictions. The Commonwealth provides least protection to whistleblowers of all Australian jurisdictions.

    FOI legislation ‘woeful’

    FOI expert Ric Snell has said that the Commonwealth Freedom of Information Act ‘performs woefully’ in important respects. Whilst requests for access to personal information are generally being responded to swiftly and positively, requests for information relating to policy are systematically failing and the situation appears to be worsening: 46.3 per cent of requests for non-personal information were rejected in full or in part.

    Disclosure failure forces minister’s resignation

    Queensland Senator and Minister for Ageing Santo Santoro has been forced to resign his post and his seat, following revelations of undisclosed share deals. When he was initially pulled up for his failure to disclose a share trade in a biotechnology firm, he blamed an oversight. But he has subsequently been revealed to have had some 72 other such ‘oversights’. The issue of whether ministers should be able to hold and trade shares is a contentious one: even outside their portfolio, they can have access to information that can directly benefit them and can participate in cabinet discussions that can affect their value. Putting shares out of reach in ‘blind trust’ for the duration is one option. Transparency through disclosure is a minimum safeguard against such potential conflicts of interest, and Santoro’s commercial dealings should have been disclosed on the Register of Members’ Interests.

    The accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests is also an issue. At the moment, the registers are held by the Parliamentary Clerks’ departments, available for inspection in person. But in Westminster and the Scottish parliaments and in New Zealand, a version of the register is available on the webpage. This one of the measures recommended by ICAC in the wake of revelations that the then-Leader of the Opposition in NSW, John Brogden, had asked parliamentary questions whilst working as a public affairs consultant for PwC, and which was apparently disclosed reluctantly (and partially) following media probing. However it appears to have been kicked into the long grass for the foreseeable future.

    Proof of ID

    The proof of identity (POI) requirements introduced as a result of last year's amendments to the Commonwealth Electoral Act have come into force. From 16 April 2007, people wishing to enroll or to amend their enrolment details will be required to prove their identity by providing a driving licence number or, in the absence of driving licence, to prove their identity in other prescribed ways.

    War on allowances

    An article in the Canberra Times drawing on Democratic Audit data has highlighted the 'mutually assured incumbency' resulting from increased federal parliamentary allowances and lax rules governing their use. MPs are now permitted to use the resources received for electorate work for party political purposes and to roll over unspent allowances for use in an election year. Independent MP Peter Andren and Democrat Senator Andrew Murray have been leading critics of this trend.

    Parliamentary privilege blocking WA corruption inquiry

    The WA Corruption and Crime Commission (CCC) has been forced to suspend its inquiry into possible misconduct by members of the Legislative Council's Standing Committee on Estimates and Financial Operations. Evidence suggested that two members of the committee were being manipulated to hold an inquiry to benefit clients of Brian Burke and Noel Crichton-Browne. The Labor President of the Legislative Council has refused to hand over documents to the CCC on the grounds of parliamentary privilege. The parliament is instead holding its own inquiry, which will not have access to the CCC's phone tap and other material.

    Read more in The Australian

    An elected House of Lords?

    British MPs have voted in favour of an entirely elected House of Lords. Though the vote was not binding, the strength of the backing for an entirely (or almost entirely) elected upper house has sent a clear message to government. The proposals were subsequently strongly rejected by the House of Lords.

    UK party funding

    The report of Sir Hayden Phillips’ review of party funding in the UK was published in March 2007. The report calls for caps on donations and greater transparency about party income. However, many of the recommendations are tentative, reflecting disagreements between the main parties about the nature of the problem and the preferred solutions.

    Coinciding with the Phillips report, Audit contributor Keith Ewing, professor of law at Kings College, London, has published his own investigation into the subject, The Cost of Democracy, in which he argues that spending caps are a more effective means than donation caps for reducing the British parties’ reliance on large donations.

    It is published by Hart.

    2 March 2007

    Senate votes against accountability measures

    Australian Democrats Senator Andrew Murray recently moved a motion in the Senate, noting last year’s Canadian reforms in the area of accountability. The Canadian reforms cover the issues of political donations, whistleblower protection and restrictions on Ministers and staffers engaging in lobbying work after they have left office. Senator Murray’s motion called for the government to consider whether Australian legislation sufficiently addresses these issues of transparency and accountability. The motion was defeated on government numbers.

    To see how your Senators voted, look at Hansard, p.13, here


    Crime and Corruption Commission transcripts

    The hearings of the Western Australian Crime and Corruption Commission inquiry into former WA premier Brian Burke and his associates are coming to an end, with two State ministers being sacked in three days as a result of evidence from phone taps. Three ministers in all have been sacked as a result of the inquiry.

    The transcripts of the hearings are available from the CCC website


    The independence of electoral administration

    Audit contributor and former Australian Electoral Commissioner, Professor Colin Hughes, is giving a Senate Occasional Lecture on 'The independence of electoral administration'. The lecture will cover the development of the Australian system of electoral administration and consider the level of independence achieved.

    Admission is free, inquiries to the Senate Procedure Office (Tel. 02 6277 3074; Email. Research.sen@aph.gov.au)

    When: Friday 23rd March 2007, 12.15 - 1.15
    Where: Main Committee Room, Parliament House, Canberra

    ACT electoral compendium

    The ACT Electoral Commission has published an Electoral Compendium, full of information about the electoral process for the Territory. It is available from their website.

    14 February 2007

    Party funding figures revealed

    The Australian Electoral Commission has disclosed the donations from companies to the political parties for 2005-06, the financial year during which the threshold for disclosure was raised.

    The full returns can be found on the AEC’s website, but some of the largest donors to the federal parties are as follows:

    Liberal Party
    Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd – $200 000
    Westfield Holdings Ltd – $160 000
    ANZ Banking Group limited – $100 000
    Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd – $100 000
    Kingold Group Companies Ltd – $100 000
    Walker Corporation Limited – $100 000
    Westpac Banking Corporation – $65 000
    Paul Ramsay Holdings Pty Ltd – $53 000
    Goldman Sachs JBWere – $50 000
    Gunns Ltd – $50 000
    Leighton Holdings – $50 000
    Resmed – $50 000
    True James Erskine – $50 000
    Phillip Morris – $35 000
    Coca-Cola Amatil – $32 500
    British American Tobacco Australia – $25 000
    Adsteam Marine Services Ltd – $20 000
    Wesfarmers – $10 000

    Total Receipts (includes other receipts): $4 212 557

    Labor Party:
    CFMEU Mining & Energy Division – $100 000
    Westfield Capital Corporation Ltd – $100 000
    ANZ Banking Group limited – $50 000
    Leighton Holdings Ltd – $50 000
    Westpac Banking Corporation – $40 000
    Coca Cola Amatil – $40 000
    Adsteam Marine Ltd – $20 000
    Profile Ray & Berndston – $15 000
    Wesfarmers Limited – $10 000

    Total Receipts (includes other receipts): $3 785 737

    National Party:
    Manildra Group of Companies - $31 000
    Adsteam Marine Ltd– $20 000.00
    Philip Morris Limited – $20 000.00
    British American Tobacco Australia – $16 600
    Wesfarmers Limited – $10 000
    Leighton Holdings Limited – $10 000
    Westpac Banking Corporation – $10 000

    Total receipts (includes other receipts): $900 177.00

    Australian Democrats:
    Under official AEC definitions, the Democrats received no donations this year.

    Total receipts (includes other receipts): $144 642

    Crikey has a review of the disclosures that also lists the details from the States and Territories (subscription required)


    Silencing Dissent

    A new book, Silencing Dissent, edited by Clive Hamilton and Sarah Maddison, and featuring a number of Audit contributors, claims the Howard Government has sought to undermine and discredit, not only independent and dissenting opinion, but also the dissenters themselves. It provides evidence of bullying, intimidation, personal attacks, withdrawal of funding, and manipulation of the rules in order to limit public debate. The victims have included charities, academics, researchers, journalists, judges, the public service, and even parliament itself.

    Links

    - Publisher's web page

    - The SMH’s review

    - and The Australian’s

    Freedom of information?

    The Sydney Morning Herald carried a bizarre story illustrating the shortcomings of the current FOI framework. Herald journalists were faced with a prospective bill for $13 000 from the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations for making a decision on whether various papers relating to the welfare-to-work might be released. They went to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a discount on public interest grounds but were denied it on the grounds that FOI requests were part of the newspapers’ normal commercial activities.

    • The full saga can be found here:

    House of Lords reform proposals

    The UK government has published a White Paper outlining proposals for a partially elected House of Lords. Reforms eliminating the right of almost all hereditary peers to sit in the second chamber were introduced in 1999, and were generally expected to be the first step in the introduction of an elected Lords. But in 2003, all the options for introducing an elected component were rejected. The government currently favours 50 per cent elected, with 50 per cent remaining appointed, though the Lords are expected to reject this. However, it has been reported that Gordon Brown, the favourite to succeed Tony Blair, will force through reform making the Lords entirely elected, once leader, if these proposals are blocked.

    Re-thinking Westminster

    The Audit's Norman Abjorensen spoke on ABC Radio National's Perspective program on 31January 2007, on the South Australian Rann government's rewriting the Westminister system of government by appointing non-Labor members to his cabinet.

    Several minutes in duration, you can read the transcript, listen online or download the MP3 (right-click and 'save as') and listen later.

    Going backwards? Women in federal politics

    In the run up to International Women's Day, women's presence in the federal Cabinet has been reduced from three to two (Senator Helen Coonan and Julie Bishop). Women now make up 11 per cent of the federal Cabinet (2 out of 18) and 13 per cent of the ministry as a whole (4 out of 30). This compares poorly with countries such as Sweden, Norway, Spain and Chilé where women make up half of Cabinet.

    Australia has also slid to its lowest-ever place in the league table of representation of women in national parliaments compiled by the Inter-Parliamentary Union. The latest figures (30 November 2006) show Australia to have dropped to 33rd place internationally, down from 15th in 1999. The ranking is based on representation in the lower house of the national parliament.

    Women are somewhat more evident on the federal Labor front bench, making up 7 out of 31 shadow ministers (23 per cent), and with Julia Gillard as Deputy Leader. On the other hand, women's presence in the Victorian Labor Cabinet dropped from seven to four (35 per cent to 20 per cent) after the election in late 2006.

    The Audit will be publishing a major new report, How Well Does Australian democracy Serve Women? in advance of International Women's Day. The report, prepared by Sarah Maddison and Emma Partridge, finds that while Australia was once a leader in the global struggle for gender equality, many of the achievements have been undone in recent years. Inquiries about advance copies should be made to the Audit project manager on daa@anu.edu.au.


    End of year deregistration of 19 political parties

    On 27 December 2006 19 political parties were de-registered when Schedule 3 of the Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Electoral Integrity and Other Measures) Act 2006 came into effect.

    The purpose of the deregistration was to eliminate liberals for forests. In the JSCEM inquiry into the 2004 federal election it was alleged that voters were misled into believing liberals for forests had some connection to the Liberal Party. In particular, liberals for forests were blamed for the Coalition's narrow loss of the seat of Richmond.

    The Commonwealth Electoral Act was promptly amended in 2004 to prevent the registration of new parties with names that might lead a reasonable person to assume a connection to an already registered party. However, liberals for forests were already registered—so the new provision for deregistration was included in the 2006 Electoral Act amendments. The deregistration of 19 parties to achieve the deregistration of one seems somewhat extreme and contrary to the encouragement of pluralistic party competition and access to the ballot paper. At least reregistration without fee can be achieved within the next six months as long as the parties still satisfy the requirement of having 500 members and comply with the new naming provisions.

    The parties de-registered were:

    Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group)
    Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
    Citizens Electoral Council of Australia (NSW Division)
    Help End Marijuana Prohibition
    Hope Party – ethics equality ecology
    liberals for forests
    New Country Party
    No Goods and Services Tax Party
    Non-Custodial Parents Party
    One Nation Queensland Division
    One Nation Western Australia
    People Power
    Progressive Labour Party
    Queensland Greens
    Republican Party of Australia
    Socialist Alliance
    The Australian Shooters Party
    The Fishing Party
    The Great Australians

    * Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters, Parliament of Australia. The Australian Electoral Commission had initially refused the registration of liberals for forests but the decision was overturned by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in 2001.

    Skewing electoral competition

    The Special Minister of State, Gary Nairn, announced on 11 January that all federal members of parliament would be entitled to one extra staff member -ie four instead of three for party backbenchers and five instead of four for Independents.

    Federal members of parliament serve very large numbers of constituents by international standards. At the 2004 election the average enrolment in federal electorates was 87 323 - far higher than the number that triggered an increase in the number of seats in 1984. By contrast, the average number of registered voters in the 2005 New Zealand general election was under 43 000 and in the UK under 68 000. At the 2004 Canadian election the average number of electors was under 73 000.

    All of this adds up to an argument for more politicians or perhaps more staff to assist the existing ones to service their electorates. However, in the absence of guidelines restricting the activities of parliamentary staff, the increase of staff further skews electoral competition in favour of incumbents. There cannot be political equality and fair competition where the balance is weighted so much against new contenders.

    The increase in staff, taken together with the increase in allowances that can be used for campaigning, such as last year's increase in the printing allowance to $150 000 (plus allowable carryover) creates an immediate and unfair advantage for incumbent politicians in an election year. Other parliaments explicitly prevent the use of parliamentary allowances such as these for campaigning purposes. In Westminster, as well as in the Scottish Parliament, there are guidelines whereby staffers paid for out of the public purse are not allowed to canvass or campaign during working hours - they may take leave or campaign out of hours, or their salaries should be reimbursed by the parties for the relevant period.

    Independent MP Peter Andren has announced his refusal of the extra staff allocation. Australia needs to start clearly distinguishing between the use of staff and parliamentary allowances for constituency and legislative work and their use to give incumbent politicians more than a head-start in electoral competition.

    19 December 2006

    Victorian Election, November 2006

    Photos below were taken outside the Melbourne Town Hall and Brunswick Street, Fitzroy polling booths on election day by Peter Brent. Click any for enlarged popup.

    The Age reported that the covert advertising campaign against the Greens by the conservative Christian group, the Exclusive Brethren, had continued in the Victorian election. This had aroused concern in the Tasmanian State election earlier in the year:

    PM’s Chief of Staff leaves takes post with investment bank

    Arthur Sinodinos, John Howard’s longstanding Chief of Staff, has left to take up a senior post with the investment bank Goldman Sachs JBWere. Sinodinos’ move has proved controversial because the company was involved with the most recent Telstra share floatation. Former public servants and politicians are prevented from moving straight into related private sector posts by ‘cooling off’ periods in many democracies, including Canada, the UK and the USA. This move, as well as former NSW Premier Bob Carr’s move to Macquarie Bank in 2005, has highlighted the absence of codes governing post-separation employment in a number of Australian jurisdictions.

    The Cole inquiry reports

    The Cole Inquiry into the AWB bribery scandal reported on 24 November 2006. The voluminous report (the summary and recommendations alone run to nearly 350 pages) concludes that responsibility lay entirely within the AWB and not with members of the government or the public service. Senior figures within the AWB had paid bribes to Iraq to secure wheat export contracts, and had consistently lied to cover themselves.

    The report is, however, critical of the lack of adequate procedures for responding to suspicions of corrupt practice, a point taken up by Prof Pat Weller who argues, in a piece in The Australian, that even if ministers and senior public servants had not deliberately turned a blind eye to AWB’s dealings, they should have known what was going on:

    Queensland corruption inquiry

    The Queensland premier Peter Beattie has forbidden all Labor members from any dealings with the former Industrial Relations and Health Minister Gordon Nuttall. Nuttall stepped down in September 2006, after it was revealed by the Queensland Crime and Misconduct Commission that he had received a large undisclosed loan from the CEO of a coal firm lobbying for a road and rail diversion to one of its mines. He is currently facing a ‘fast-track’ expulsion from the ALP.

    • Read more in the Courier Mail, here and here

    UK party loans

    The controversy surrounding party finance in the UK has continued, as the full extent of the major parties’ reliance on loans has emerged. Labour and the Conservatives owe around £59 million (more than AU$147 million at the current rate of exchange). These private loans have come to light since a change to the Electoral Commission’s disclosure regulations: loans were previously hidden as the disclosure rules only covered donations. Many of the loans were effectively donations as they were never intended to be repaid.

    Canada strengthens accountability

    The Canadian Federal Accountability Act received Royal Assent on 12 December 2006. Under the Act. Under it:
    • All corporate and union donations to political parties and candidates are banned;
    • The amount an individual can donate to a party or candidate is reduced to $1000 p.a., as is the contribution an individual can make to their own campaign;
    • A new Commissioner of Lobbying is created, as an Agent of Parliament;
    • Ministers, ministerial staffers and senior public servants are prohibited from lobbying the Canadian Government for five years after leaving office;
    • The role of the Ethics Commissioner and the Auditor General is strengthened;
    • Transparency of the commissioning of public opinion research and advertising is increased;
    • An independent Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal is created, to increase protection for whistleblowers.

    November 17 2006

    State corruption inquiries

    The WA Corruption and Crime Commission’s investigation into the activities of lobbyists acting for developer Canal Rocks has now seen a minister sacked and forced to resign from parliament. Norm Marlborough, Labor Minister for Small Business is the latest victim. Undisclosed donations to various local government candidates by former Liberal power broker Noel Crichton-Browne were mentioned in the last Audit Update.

    Much of the new controversy focuses on the activities of Brian Burke, the former WA premier, who like Crichton-Browne, was lobbying on behalf of Canal Rocks. Marlborough kept a separate mobile phone for talking to Burke and was taped apparently taking instruction on the appointment to a government board of a councillor thought to be sympathetic to the developer’s proposals.

    Burke was gaoled for corruption in 1994 over fraudulent travel claims. Current WA Premier, Alan Carpenter, has warned his ministers against any dealings with Burke or his associates and a register of lobbyists is now being considered.

    In Queensland, the state’s Crime and Misconduct Commission is investigating a government decision to bankroll a $20 million road and rail deviation to Macarthur Coal’s Coppabella Mine, after it was revealed that the company’s Chief Executive had loaned the then Industrial Relations Minister Gordon Nuttall $300 000. The loan was not disclosed in the official parliamentary register, and Nuttall had not abstained from any votes on the matter, nor had he declared a conflict of interest.

    In Tasmania former Deputy Premier Bryan Green has been charged with criminal conspiracy (in Hobart Magistrates Court, 25 October) over giving a company run by former Tasmanian and Queensland Labor ministers a monopoly over accreditation of building professionals in the State.

    Labor debates over developer donation ban

    Senior Labor figures are divided over a ban on developer donations. NSW premier Morris Iemma has called for a ban, but Queensland premier Peter Beattie rejects the idea, arguing that transparency rather than source of donation is the issue. Former PM Paul Keating is critical of NSW Labor’s record on developer donations and planning decisions. NSW Labor has collected over $5 million in developer donations since its re-election in 2003, and, along with the Liberals and Nationals, voted down a Greens private members bill aiming to ban developer donations to political parties.

    More in the Sydney Morning Herald

    The issue of political donations was discussed by Janet Albrechtsen in The Australian

    How to do US elections

    Electoral expert Professor Richard Hasen writes in the New York Times on the problems with electronic voting machines in the US mid-term elections. He argues that the problem lies less with technology than with the people administering elections. Instead of party hacks, the US needs nonpartisan professionals such as those that administer Australian and Canadian elections.

    More in the New York Times (free registration may be necessary)

    Go to Rick Hasen's Election Law blog .

    6 November 2006

    Government advertising campaigns controversy

    In last week's Senate estimates hearings, it emerged that the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet had omitted from its Annual Report any figure for expenditure on government advertising campaigns. There had in fact been an increase of nearly 50 per cent in such expenditure. The Government dismissed the omission as a mere oversight. The Opposition, however, were unconvinced, accusing the Government of concocting a 'pathetic “dog ate my homework” excuse'.

    • Read the transcript from Hansard here

    Electoral numbers drop

    It also emerged in Senate Estimates that the number of Australians enrolled to vote has fallen for the first time in ten years. The Australian Electoral Commission was unable to provide a definitive explanation for the fall. It is too early for the recent restrictions on enrolment to have had an effect, though they are likely to exacerbate any existing enrolment problems.

    • Read the transcript from Hansard here

    Secret ballot for the blind in Victorian election

    Blind and vision-impaired voters will have the opportunity for the first time to cast a secret ballot in the Victorian State election on 25 November. Electronic voting will be introduced at six polling places on a trial basis, following the successful experiment at the last two ACT elections. Information on where to vote is being disseminated by Vision Australia.


    Debate resumes on Citizenship Bill

    Debate resumed in the House of Representatives on 31 October and for the next two days on the Australian Citizenship Bill 2005. Inter alia the Bill lengthens the waiting time for Australian citizenship from two to four years. The Bill is not expect to complete its passage through parliament before the Autumn session 2007.

    Full details of the Bill, including text, explanatory note, proposed amendments, and the speeches from the second reading are available here


    NSW Local Government Association supports a national summit on political finance

    The NSW Local Government Association has supported the call for a national summit to review political finance legislation at federal, State and local levels of government. The national summit is being promoted by the Deputy Mayor of Manly and Convenor of Democracy Watch, Brad Peterson.

    For the reasons why the role of money in Australian electoral politics needs to be reviewed see Democracy Watch


    WA Public Funding Bill receives Royal Assent

    Western Australia has now joined the Commonwealth, NSW, Victoria, Queensland and the ACT in having public funding for parties and Independents who achieve at least 4 per cent of the vote. The amount is indexed and set to reach $1.50 per vote by the time the next election is due, in 2009. It is not tied to any restrictions on private political donations.


    Developer involvement in WA local elections

    A former Liberal Party powerbroker operating on behalf of a property developer has admitted involvement in the election campaign for Busselton council in WA. Appearing before the Corruption and Crime Commission, Noel Crichton-Browne admitted attempting to keep payments to various candidates secret by paying them in instalments less than the $200 disclosure threshold, as part of a campaign to win planning approval for a $300 million development.


    US election chaos?

    Ahead of the US mid-term elections on 7 November 2006, and in the wake of the controversies over the result of the last two presidential elections, Jonah Goldman of the National Campaign for Fair Elections has written a highly critical essay on the state of electoral administration in America, which he labels ‘third rate’ and could result in nationwide ‘chaos’ at the polls.

    This prediction is supported by the findings of a report by electionline.org, an election-monitoring body based at the University of Richmond. Issues relating to voting technology and its security, new ID requirements, and the objectivity of voting officials are identified as potential sources of problems and ten States identified as the most likely locations for them.

    • Read their report here

    The New York Times reports that the parties are preparing themselves for the impending controversy by recruiting teams of lawyers to monitor polling in potential ‘flash points’.

    • Read New York Times article (free registration required)

    26 October 2006

    Electoral Amendment Act 2006

    The AEC has published a short explanatory paper on the recent changes to the Commonwealth Electoral Act. The controversial changes have, amongst other things, introduced the earlier closing of the electoral roll, stricter proof of identity (ID) requirements for registering and voting, and significantly raised the threshold for disclosure of political donations.

    The AEC’s annual report for 2005-06 is also now available here.

    Limiting Democracy

    Former Victorian premier, John Cain, has a review of Brian Costar and Colin Hughes’ book on the changes to the Commonwealth Electoral Act of June 2006. Australia is one of the only democracies where the rules governing political finance are being weakened rather than strengthened. Cain focuses on the changes to the rules governing disclosure of political donations, which, like the authors, he sees as a straightforward attempt to limit the transparency of the process.

    The Audit’s Marian Sawer’s review of the book is available here.

    New media laws and investigative journalism

    There has been much discussion in the press about the likely impact of the changes to Australian media ownership laws on the diversity of information sources. The media editor of The Age suggests that the changes also threaten the existence of investigative journalism.

    October 6 2006

    Liberal Senator calls for ban on corporate donations to political parties

    Senator Gary Humphries has called for a ban on corporate and union donations to political parties, as in Canada, on the grounds they are undermining confidence in politics. Humphries argues in the Liberal Party journal The Party Room that the current system of public funding should be extended and bring an end to private attempts to buy influence in the decisions of government.


    The Audit on ABC

    ABC Radio National's 'Perspective' program will broadcast this Friday, 6 October, at 5.55pm a shortened version of the Audit discussion paper by the Norman Abjorensen on the recent banning of two Islamic books in Australia. (Update: Listen to the MP3 here.)

    WA introduces proportional representation but retains property votes in local government

    The West Australian government has introduced legislation to parliament that changes the voting system in local government elections from ‘first past the post’ to ‘proportional preferential’.

    US voter ID/registration conference

    The Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project's two-day Voter Identification/Registration Conference began on 5 October at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It explores the ‘current state of knowledge about the effects of voter identification and registration procedures on election administration and voting behaviour'.

    While United States electoral administration is very different to Australia's (and Australia, like New Zealand, has compulsory registration, while in America and Canada it is voluntary), many of the issues are instantly recognisable.


    History of the Indigenous vote

    The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has published a short History of the Indigenous Vote. It outlines Indigenous Australians’ achievement of the right to vote, its loss at federation, their regaining of the franchise in the 1960s and the more active engagement in the subsequent years.

    • It can be downloaded from the AEC here


    Irish PM in loan controversy

    Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern has been forced to apologise over loans he received whilst finance minister in the early 1990s. Whilst maintaining he has breached no rules, he admitted errors of judgement and was forced to apologise to parliament. The loans came to light following an investigation into corruption in the planning process in Dublin in the 1990s.

    The erosion of electoral rights

    Limiting Democracy: The Erosion of Electoral Rights in Australia by Audit contributors Colin Hughes and Brian Costar has been published by UNSW Press. More details at publisher's website

    • Read review of the book by the Audit leader, Marian Sawer here

    September 22 2006

    Public funding comes to WA, also prisoner disenfranchisement

    In Western Australia, the Labor government’s electoral reform legislation has passed the lower house. The original Bill has been split into three, to deal with the three main aspects of the reforms.

    Public funding is being introduced for WA State elections, with the amount currently set at $1.39 per vote (with a threshold vote of 4 per cent required). This amount is set to increase to more than $1.50 by the time of the next election, due in 2009. The government is obviously serious about this—the funding rate is calculated to six decimal places (i.e. one millionth of a cent per vote). The legislation differs from the federal funding scheme in that parties will not be able to receive more than they actually spend in election campaigns. This isn’t a problem for the major parties, given they receive substantial corporate donations in addition to public funding, but can be a problem for minor parties who underestimate their likely vote and hence spend less than their entitlement.

    At the WA Parliament website the legislation—Electoral Reform (Electoral Funding) Bill 2006—can be downloaded by PDF here. To find debates use the Hansard search page.

    In associated legislation (Electoral Legislation Amendment Bill 2006 and Parliamentary Legislation Amendment Bill 2006), the Labor government is disenfranchising all prisoners (previously prisoners serving terms less than one year could vote), and broadening the definition of parliamentary party status. Party status provides additional resources, such as staffing, to those parties that qualify, and was previously available to any parties with five members in the Assembly. This is now being broadened to the Assembly and/or the Council. Labor resisted this last change during its previous term—when the Greens had five Council members. The Greens only have two now.

     

    September 19, 2006

    Australian polling day - always a Saturday

    The Queensland State election 9 September 2006, photos taken outside the Brisbane Town Hall polling booth by Peter Brent. Click any for enlarged popup.

     

    September 15 2006

    Disallowance power damages ACT democracy

    A Bill introduced by Senator Bob Brown to remove the Commonwealth's power to disallow ACT legislation was debated in the Senate on 14 September 2006. Section 5 (2) of the Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act, 1988 provides that the Governor-General can disallow any law passed by the ACT Legislative Assembly within six months. There are no conditions that need to be satisfied before this power is exercised and the disallowance instrument merely has to be tabled in both houses of the federal parliament.

    The Commonwealth has already disallowed the ACT's Civil Unions Act 2006 and is now threatening to over-ride the ACT's anti-terrorism legislation on the grounds that it is not tough enough (for example, not allowing children to be subject to preventive detention). With the government controlling the Senate, such disallowance of an elected government's legislation cannot be prevented. By contrast, when the Commonwealth did away with the Northern Territory's euthanasia legislation in 1998 it did so by use of its Territories power (section 122 of the Constitution), requiring a Bill to pass through both houses of parliament.

    • For more detail on the desirability of removing the disallowance power from the ACT (Self-Government) Act see Cheyne Bester and Shawn Lambert in the Canberra Times 15 September 2006

    September 14 2006

    Erosion of Electoral Rights

    Limiting Democracy: The Erosion of Electoral Rights in Australia has just been released by UNSW Press. Australia's electoral system is distinctive, independent and widely respected. For years, parties across the political spectrum have supported its main features - compulsory voting, an independent electoral commission, uniform rules across the nation. Yet, in 2006, all that began to change.

    Because Australians have no explicit constitutional right to vote, parliament has wide discretion over how its members are elected. Having won control of both houses of parliament, the Howard government introduced legislation that erodes the right to vote and relaxes controls over political donations, all in the name of "electoral integrity." Forced through parliament in mid-2006, these measures are dangerous for democracy.

    In this book, Colin A. Hughes - Australia's first electoral commissioner - and Brian Costar reveal the dangers of the government's legislation, and of other potential changes flagged by government MPs. They trace the history of Australia's admired electoral system, revealing the carefully crafted rules that have ensured a fair and transparent system - a system now endangered by a set of poorly considered changes.

    UK Government Backs FOI Effectiveness Study

    The UK government has helped fund an independent study by the Constitution Unit at University College London of whether the UK FOI Act has been effective in making government more accountable. UCL claim this is the first large-scale study of the consequences of FOI anywhere in the world.

    • Read more at IWR

     

    September 7, 2006

    High Court FOI ruling endorses government secrecy

    Fresh doubts have been cast on the effectiveness of the Commonwealth’s freedom of information laws after the High Court, in a 3-2 decision, rejected an appeal by a journalist at The Australian newspaper against a decision to block access to Treasury documents. The documents sought by FOI editor Michael McKinnon, related to revenue projections from tax bracket creep, as well as fraud in the First Home Owner Grant.

    Despite a dissenting judgement from Chief Justice Murray Gleeson and Justice Michael Kirby, a majority upheld a ruling by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal that it did not have the power to decide whether the release of the documents sought by McKinnon was in the public interest.

    August 31 2006

    Reform of the Senate committee system

    The Parliamentary Studies Centre and the Centre for International and Public Law, both at ANU, are holding a workshop to consider the Senate committee system on Friday 15 September in the Studio Theatre at the National Museum of Australia in Canberra. The timetable is:

    • 9.30-10.30 Views from the Senate: including Harry Evans, Clerk of the Senate; Senator Marise Payne; Senator Joe Ludwig; Senator Andrew Bartlett.
    • 11am-12noon Views from ‘users’ of the committee system:
      Including Professor Jon Altman, ANU Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research; Professor John Warhurst, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, ANU

     

    August 30 2006

     

    Political finance reform

    New Matilda has an article by Greens NSW Legislative Council member Lee Rhiannon, and Norman Thompson, who runs her project on political donations, calling for a significant overhaul of the regulations governing political party funding. They argue that foreign donations and corporate and union donations should be banned, and caps on individual donations and campaign spending introduced.

    Read article

    Also on party funding reform, the Greens (WA) have produced this discussion paper on electoral funding reform, as part of the debate about the introduction of public funding for parties in the State.

    Read Greens (WA) discussion paper


    UK party funding controversy continues

    The UK Electoral Commission has criticised both the Labour and Conservative parties for being overly secretive about their private funding. The Conservatives’ reluctance to make more detailed disclosures about their loans has been a particular source of concern for the Commission.

    Read Guardian article

    Parliamentary inquiry into civics and electoral education

    A team from the Democratic Audit appeared before the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters on 11 August 2006, as part the ongoing inquiry into civics and electoral education. The transcript and the written submission are available from the Committee’s webpage:

    Go to committee webpage


    Appointments to public boards

    Meredith Edwards, Emeritus Professor at the University of Canberra, has written a comprehensive analysis of the appointments process to public boards in Australia. Australia has yet to embark on the significant reform of the process seen in countries such as the UK and Canada, where change was seen as vital to maintain any confidence in the integrity of the system.

    Read Issues paper

    August 10 2006

    Human rights charter for Victoria

    Victoria has become only the second jurisdiction (after the ACT) to enact a human rights charter. The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 was passed on July 25th 2006, and comes into force in January 2007.

    Renewing Accountability

    A group of former senior MPs from both major parties have released a discussion paper calling for a strengthening of the capacity of parliament in Australia to hold government to account. Various measures are being taken in other Westminster parliaments with the aim of improving the accountability process but Australia is lagging. Amongst the steps they call for are the appointment of a Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, and special legislation clarifying government accountability to parliament.

    • A piece in The Age summarises the main findings.
    • In the same paper, Michelle Grattan has an article discussing the report and its recommendations.

    Ministerial resignation in Tasmania

    Bryan Green, Tasmanian Deputy Premier, has resigned from all frontbench and leadership roles following a scandal involving his relationship with a company run by his former colleagues. Mr Green granted a three year monopoly to the Tasmanian Compliance Corporation, a building accreditation company run by two former Labor ministers. The Director of Public Prosecutions and the Auditor General are investigating the matter. Mr Green had initially resisted resigning and maintained that his apology to parliament was sufficient.

    Queensland electoral law changes

    The Queensland government is planning major changes to its electoral law in the wake of the Federal changes and claims of bribery of local councillors. The detail of the changes has yet to be decided though it has been confirmed that, in line with Federal law, prisoners will lose the right to vote.

     

    July 26 2006

    The Senate under government control

    Australian Democrat Senator Andrew Murray has compiled figures on the scrutiny and legislative review process in the Senate since 1 July 2005 and compared it with previous periods where no party had overall Senate control. On every measure considered – length of time for committees to consider bills, acceptance of non-government amendments, use of the guillotine to curtail debate; rejection of references to committees – there has been a weakening of legislative review functions.

    Internal party democracy?

    After the furore surrounding the role of factions in Labor’s preselection process in Victoria earlier this year, now it is the Liberals’ turn. ABC’s Four Corners program on 17 July 2006 focussed on attempts by the far right to dominate internal processes in the New South Wales Liberal Party, and the nefarious tactics used by both major factions in the party in their internecine battles.

    • The transcript of the broadcast is available here:

    The program has produced considerable comment, such as this piece by Anne Davies in The Sydney Morning Herald.

     

    John Keane on democracy and political parties

    Australian-born, UK-based political theorist John Keane considered the shortcomings of political parties in a piece in The Sydney Morning Herald on 24 July 2006. He argues that the stranglehold that parties have on the representative process is the central cause of modern disillusionment with the political process:

    The State of Democracy at IPSA

    The Democratic Audit of Australia organised two panels on State of Democracy methodology in July at the International Political Science Association Congress in Fukuoka, Japan. The papers, by those involved in Democratic Audits in different parts of the world, are all available here

     

    Axing of Senate committees to limit scrutiny

    In the last sitting week before the winter recess the Government proposed controversial changes to the committee system in the Senate. Under these changes the number of committees will be reduced and the opposition-chaired references committees abolished. This will leave all the committee chairs in government hands. The government has claimed that the references committees are under-utilised, which has been a reality since the government achieved its majority in the Senate. Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce has suggested that removing the part of the committee system under opposition control might lessen the reluctance to refer controversial issues for committee scrutiny. However, the opposition parties, and Harry Evans, Clerk of the Senate, have said that there is a serious danger of undermining the Senate’s capacity to hold the government to account; any inquiries with the potential to embarrass the Government are likely to be vetoed.

     

      June 26 2006

    The Democratic Audit of Australia is hosting two panels at the International Political Science Association Congress in Fukuoka on 11 July. The papers include the following:

    June 26 2006

    JSCEM civics inquiry

    The submissions to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters’ inquiry into Civics and Electoral Education can now be viewed on their website. Naturally, we would draw your attention to the Democratic Audit’s contribution, amongst the numerous interesting submissions from a wide variety of individuals and groups.

    Link to Inquiry

    June 15 2006

    Draft Electoral and Referendum Amendment Bill


    The Draft Electoral and Referendum Amendment Act is being debated again in the Senate this week and is still attracting controversy and criticism.

    Writing in The Age, George Williams of the Gilbert & Tobin Centre of Public Law at UNSW calls it a ‘major step backwards for our electoral system’.

    Read Williams column

    Also in The Age, Human Rights Solicitor Waleed Aly attacks the measures contained in it that strip prisoners of their right to vote.

    Read Aly column

    Harder to vote, easier to donate

    Australian Policy Online has published an article by Marian Sawer, Director of the Audit, that criticises the trajectory of electoral reform in Australia. The Government is simultaneously making the process of political donations less transparent, whilst making it harder for people to exercise their right to vote.

    Read Sawer article

    Dirty tricks in US electoral administration?

    An article in Rolling Stone magazine Robert F. Kennedy Jnr has caused much comment in the US and beyond. He alleges that George W. Bush’s victory in the 2004 Presidential election was the result, in part, of dirty tricks by partisan electoral officials in Ohio. These range from: voter registrations mysteriously lost, or even shredded; late or missing ballots for US voters overseas; maldistribution of voting machines and ‘suspiciously’ malfunctioning voting equipment.

    At least some of the claims in the article have been dismissed. However, it does draw attention to the problems created by partisan electoral administration. Even after the controversy surrounding the 2000 Presidential Election it seems lessons have either not been learnt or are being deliberately ignored.

    Read the Kennedy article here

    And a couple of the many responses to it here and here

    Federalism undermined on ACT civil unions

    The Federal Government has used its power to disallow Territory legislation to over-rule the ACT's Civil Unions Act 2006. The disallowance took effect from midnight 13 June. Moves in the Senate by the Democrats, Greens and Labor to block the disallowance were unsuccessful, despite Liberal Senator and former ACT Chief Minister Gary Humphries crossing the floor. The use of administrative action to overturn legislation, for which the ACT government had an election mandate and which was within its powers, has been highly controversial. Critics see it as another attack on the principles of federalism.

    Electronic voting in Victoria

    Following an inquiry into Electronic Democracy, the Victorian Government has introduced measure to facilitate electronic voting in State elections. Peter Chen, the co-author of the forthcoming Audit report on Electronic Democracy, was a consultant on the inquiry.
    http://www.peterjohnchen.com/files/FinalReport.pdf [2.5mb]

    Votes at 16 in the ACT?

    The ACT Legislative Assembly's Standing Committee on Education, Training, and Young People is holding an inquiry into the desirability and possible consequences of allowing 16 and 17 year old ACT residents to vote in Territory elections. Amongst the issues under consideration are:

    national conformity and consistency with other jurisdictions;
    the legal implications of compulsory enrolment and voting for young people;
    eligibility for election to the ACT Legislative Assembly;
    resource implications of extending and maintaining the ACT electoral roll;
    issues affecting the electoral awareness of young people;
    different electoral models; and
    other factors that influence the democratic participation of young people.

    The deadline for written submissions to the inquiry is 28 July 2006.
    http://www.parliament.act.gov.au/committees/index1.asp?committee=53&inquiry=222

    Victoria FoI Review

    The Victorian Ombudsman has produced the final report of a review of implementation of the Freedom of Information Act 1982. The review found that FOI requests were, for the most part, being answered in full and within the official 45 day period. However, delays in processing were still an issue, with some 30 per cent of requests not responded to within the statutory time frame in February 2006. This was, however an improvement over the 44 per cent in 2003-04. The lack of quality in reasons for decisions was also an issue, as was the poor level of assistance to applicants.

    Overall, the review found that, of the 22 500 FOI requests made in 2004-05, full access was given to 77 per cent, partial access to 20 per cent, leaving only 3 per cent refused.
    http://www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au/CA256F88000946E3/page/Listing-Home%2BPage%2BNews-Review%2Bof%2Bthe%2BFreedom%2Bof%2BInformation%2BAct%2Breleased

    Public funding for parties

    With public funding of political parties proposed in Western Australia, Senator Andrew Murray (Democrats) argues, in this Audit discussion paper, that a quid pro quo is required in the form of higher standards of governance, transparency, and accountability, from the parties that receive it.

    Read the paper

    Party funding remains a controversial issue in the UK, where the Committee on Standards in Public Life is conducting an inquiry into the integrity of democratic processes, through a review of the mandate of the Electoral Commission. The Committee’s inquiry has, in particular, highlighted the extent of the ignorance surrounding the huge loans which the Labour and Conservative Parties have been using to circumvent party funding regulations.

    Read BBC story

    Go to the Committee’s webpage

    More general concerns about party funding in the UK have led to the establishment of an inquiry into the possible introduction of public funding.

    Inquiry link

    May 26 2006

    Are our politicians for sale?

    Richard Baker in The Age reports on the increasing trend for the parties to sell access to their leaders to stock the party coffers. The current Electoral Amendment Bill will make this, and other sorts of corporate donations far less visible, raising serious concerns about the potential for corruption.

    The Democratic Audit’s focused Audit on Political Finance and Government Advertising, By Joo-Cheong Tham and Sally Young, which is cited in The Age article, will be published later this winter.

     

     

    Public funding for parties in WA?

    The issue of party funding is also current in Western Australia, where the introduction of public funding for parties contesting State elections is again being considered. Public funding should reduce the reliance of parties on private donations and allow smaller parties to compete more effectively. However, the concern is that this move will simply add to, rather than replace, the current system of donations, whilst its efficacy in levelling the playing field for smaller parties is dependent on the thresholds that are set.

    Australian Bills of Rights: The ACT and Beyond

    The ACT Human Rights Research Project, at the Regulatory Institutions Network at the ANU and the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law at UNSW are holding a one-day event in Canberra that will assess recent developments in Australian Bills of Rights. The conference will survey the impact of the ACT Human Rights Act over the last year in the courts, legislature and the bureaucracy. It will also look at the proposed Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities in Victoria, at developments in other States and at the national level, and the comparative perspective from New Zealand. The day is aimed at both a legal and non-legal audience.

    When: Wednesday 21 June 2006

    Where: Law Theatre, Faculty of Law, Australian National University

    Cost: $150 (including lunch), $60 for concessions

    Registration forms and program are available at http://acthra.anu.edu.au/, or ph Gabrielle McKinnon on 6125 7103.

    New Version of the Australian Government and Politics Website

    The new version of the Australian Government and Politics website is now on line and includes the final results for the March South Australian and Tasmanian elections. As well as a new server and updated software, the website is undergoing a major overhaul and has enhanced information on NSW politics and government thanks to a grant from the NSW Sesquicentenary Committee. It is hoped to add similar additional information to entries for the other States and the Commonwealth.

    May 16 2006

    Electoral changes pushed through House of Representatives

    After minimal debate on 10 and 11 May, and three gag motions, the government's changes to the Commonwealth Electoral Act were pushed through the House of Representatives on 11 May 2006. The Democratic Audit has expressed serious concern over the impact of these changes, which include early closure of the electoral roll and raising the threshold for disclosure of political donations.

    Independent Peter Andren moved two sets of amendments, the first of which were supported by the ALP and related to early closure of the roll and prisoner franchise. The second set proposed eliminating the above-the-line option on Senate tickets in favour of partial preferential voting below the line. This change would require preferences to be expressed by voters for as many seats as to be filled, rather than for preferences to flow in accordance with party deals few voters know about. The current above-the-line option of party ticket voting is chosen by about 95 per cent of voters, because otherwise they have to mark preferences for all candidates below the line-a very laborious process. In NSW in the 2004 federal election, voters would have had to mark 78 sequential preferences to register a formal Senate vote below the line. It is not surprising that 97 per cent decided not to do this, even if it meant their preferences then flowed in directions they might not have approved of.

    Andren also proposed introducing an expenditure cap of $50 000 for federal candidates, with an exception for those standing in the largest electorates ($72 000). Such expenditure caps would do much towards creating a level playing field for electoral competition. Andren also proposed lowering the disclosure threshold for political donations, rather than raising it, and requiring the written authority of the candidate for any gifts or expenditure on their behalf. This set of amendments was supported only by the three Independents in the House. The government's Bill is due to be debated in the Senate when parliament resumes on 13 June.

    While the Australian government may be making it 'harder to vote but easier to make secret donations to political parties', the new Conservative government in Canada is moving in the opposite direction. It has introduced amendments to the Canada Elections Act that will introduce a limit of $1000 (previously $5000) on the amount an individual may contribute to a party or candidate in a given year and totally banning contributions by corporations, trade unions or associations (previously a limit of $1000). The changes are to be found in Bill C-2, which had its First Reading on 11 April 2006: ‘An Act providing for conflict of interest rules, restrictions on election financing and measures respecting administrative transparency, oversight and accountability’ (short title: Federal Accountability Act).

    Government cuts Senate estimates

    The Senate has voted to weaken its ability to scrutinise the government after it passed government measures to axe the Senate Estimates spillover days. The Estimates hearings could previously continue onto Fridays if business demanded it. The government used its narrow Senate majority to push through the changes. Both Labor and the Democrats have condemned the move, claiming that the government is reneging on its promise not to abuse its majority in the Senate to curtail the scrutiny process. The government defended its move by claiming that the time available for scrutiny was broadly comparable with other countries.

    Compulsory voting

    Following the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matter's recommendation that compulsory voting be scrapped, the Australian Electoral Commission has published this review of the arguments and includes some information from abroad.

    Ironically, the influential British think tank, the Institute for Public Policy Reform, has recently recommended that compulsory voting is the best solution for the ongoing problem of poor turnout.

    Less freedom more violence for media workers

    A report just published by the Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance (MEAA) complains of an anti-media environment which it blames on the growing legislated controls on media freedom. It also expresses concern that media workers are increasingly the targets of violence. The issues are raised in the MEAA's second report into the state of press freedom in Australia launched on 28 April 2006 at the Australian Press Freedom Dinner in Sydney.

    Unfairness in asylum decision

    In a piece for New Matilda, Julian Burnside QC criticises the Government's decision to process asylum applications from ‘boatpeople’ off-shore. Not only is the move massively more expensive, but also infringes basic human rights in order to appease the Indonesian government. He goes on to criticise the Government's industrial relations and national security reforms.

    UK civil liberties ‘rebalance’

    In the, Prime Minister Tony Blair has called for a ‘profound rebalancing’ of the civil liberties debate in the UK. ‘Despite our attempts - and we have made many of them - to toughen and reform the criminal justice system ... the criminal justice system is the public service most distant from what reasonable people want’, he said.

    A brief history of sedition

    This e-brief from the Parliamentary Library provides an overview of the development of sedition law in Australia, including the recent changes made under the Anti-Terrorism Act 2005.

    Promoting democracy - a review

    The Dutch Government has published a study of efforts to promote democracy and to bridge the gap between voters and elected representatives that they say has emerged throughout the established democracies of the developed world. The study reviews the programs of 18 OECD countries, including Australia, and, whilst the conclusions drawn are aimed at the Netherlands, they will have resonance in all the countries studied.

    Conference on legislatures and human rights

    The University of Melbourne's Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies is hosting an international conference exploring the role of legislatures in protecting human rights 20-22 July 2006.

     

    April 13 2006

    Italian ex-pats vote

    Ousted Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, is contesting the result of the Italian election in part because so many Australian-based voters tried to vote preferentially, spoiling their ballots.

    The general election held on 9–10 April 2006 has produced a change of government with Romani Prodi’s centre-left coalition evidently triumphing in both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate.

    Prodi’s coalition was the plurality winner for the Chamber of Deputies by the smallest of margins—some 25 000 votes out of an electorate of 47 million. This translates, however, into 55 per cent of the seats in the lower house thanks to the bonus arrangement whereby a plurality winner is allocated no less than 340 seats.

    The controversy that has prompted the Berlusconi challenge relates to the result in the Senate, where Prodi’s coalition has won a narrow, two-seat majority by winning four of the six newly created seats for expatriate voters. Melbourne's Nino Randazzo, long-time Editor of Il Globo, was one of the newly-elected Senators who decided the outcome.

    The global campaign manager for Mr Berlusconi's Forza Italia has pointed to the 10 698 spoiled ballot papers cast in Australia, 27 per cent of the total, as a possible ground for a recount. Some voters spoiled their ballots by numbering the candidates as they would in an Australian election, rather than putting a cross against a single, preferred candidate.

    New Italian electoral law provides 3.5 million expatriate Italians with their own representatives—12 seats in the Chamber of Deputies and six seats in the Senate. Expatriate Italians have four geographical constituencies, Europe outside Italy, South America, North and Central America, Africa, Asia and Oceania. Italo-Australians dominate the latter electorate, with 120 000 out of the 200 000 voters.

    Apart from Senator Randazzo, Melbourne-based Marco Fedi was elected to the Chamber of Deputies. Both are committed to pursuing issues relating to pensions and reacquisition of Italian citizenship. Their electorate stretches from the west coast of Africa to the Pacific Islands and north to Mongolia.

    Observers will have been watching the innovations in expatriate representation carefully, not least in Australia where expatriates can only enrol on the overseas voters' register if they intend to return to Australia within six years. In 2004 the Audit published a paper by Andrew Leigh, arguing for a Senator for Expat Australians.

     

    Electoral Commission shifts position

    Audit contributor Brian Costar and Peter Browne, both of Swinburne Institute for Social Research, consider the role of the Australian Electoral Commission in the current passage of the Electoral and Referendum Amendment Act. They criticise the Commission’s apparent shift in position over the current Electoral Amendment Bill, that will see early closure of the electoral roll. Previously the Commission had provided evidence that early closure of the roll would not improve its accuracy, because less time would be available for voters to got on the roll or correct their enrolment details. Now the new Commissioner says it will make their life easier.

     

    • Norm Kelly, former Audit manager, and former Democrat member of the WA Parliament, reviewed the draft Bill and its implication for On-Line Opinion

    The Senate's Finance and Public Administration Committee published its report on the draft Electoral and Referendum Bill on 29 March 2006. The Committee finds little to disagree with in the Bill, in spite of a considerable volume of evidence critical of it (including submissions from several Audit contributors). However, both the Labor and Democrat members of the Committee were sufficiently dissatisfied with the Report to produce more critical dissenting reports.

    Former Democratic Audit project manager, Norm Kelly, has provided a summary and commentary on the Bill

    In a recent Canberra Times article, he criticises the provisions relating to the disclosure of political donations and their tax deductibility status.

    And a new research report by the Parliamentary Library suggests major parties would, based on average for the past seven financial years, disclose the details of about two-thirds (64.1 per cent) of their total declared receipts if the threshold were increased to 'more than $10 000', as the draft bill proposes. Under the current threshold, they disclose the details for three-quarters of their total receipts (74.7 per cent). However, past figures may not be a useful guide to disclosure under the higher threshold. A higher threshold may encourage existing donors to change their behaviour; they may choose to split their current contributions, thereby negating the need to lodge a return.


    Report on disclosure of political donations

    The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) published the report on its inquiry into the disclosure of donations to political parties and candidates. Despite running for two years, the report is a short one, and in agreement with the thrust of the draft Electoral and Referendum Bill, towards more generous disclosure thresholds. But, as with the Senate Committee's report on the draft Bill, the ALP members and the Democrat member submitted dissenting reports.

    Read the report


    ACT Civil Union Bill

    The ACT Chief Minister (and Attorney General) Jon Stanhope has introduced the Civil Union Bill, which would give gay and lesbian couples the same rights under ACT law as married partners. The day after its introduction on 28 March, the federal Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, wrote to the Chief Minister saying the federal government would overturn the legislation unless it was redrafted to distinguish civil unions from marriage. The federal Attorney-General objected to the use of federally registered marriage celebrants to officiate over civil unions. The Commonwealth has previously overturned the Northern Territory's euthanasia legislation in 1997. This was the subject of a conscience vote in federal parliament and the ACT Chief Minister is insisting that the Civil Union legislation be treated in the same way.

    ACT Anti-Terrorism Bill

    The ACT government is also on a collision course with the federal government over anti-terrorism legislation. The ACT legislation introduced this week differs from laws in other States and Territories in refusing to permit 16-year-olds to be detained without charge and in forcing police to meet a higher threshold before preventively detaining suspects. The ACT Chief Minister has insisted that the anti-terrorism legislation must comply with the ACT Human Rights Act and with international obligations such as those under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The AFP Commissioner and the federal Attorney-General have claimed that the legislative differences would expose the Territory to a terrorist attack.

    The 'quiet revolution' in Indigenous Affairs

    Bill Gray and Will Sanders of the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, ANU, have released a discussion paper entitled Views from the top of the 'quiet revolution': Secretarial perspectives on the new arrangements in Indigenous Affairs. It is based on interviews with 11 members of the Commonwealth government's Secretaries Group on Indigenous Affairs about the new arrangements dating from July 2004. It concludes that whether the new arrangements work will ultimately depend on relationships between government and Indigenous communities built over extended periods of time.

    Read the discussion paper


    Tasmania and South Australia vote

    State elections were held in both Tasmania and South Australia with the sitting ALP governments both retaining control. We'll be publishing a paper on the South Australian election by Haydon Manning and Geoff Anderson of Flinders University next month.

    The most controversial development to emerge from the Tasmanian election was the alleged involvement of the secretive Christian group, the Exclusive Brethren. They are accused of being behind a smear campaign targeting the Greens, though the negligible disclosure rules regarding funding of political campaigns in Tasmania mean that it is hard to be sure about the extent of their involvement.

    The issue is discussed in The Australian.


    International Women's Day

    To mark this year's International Women's Day (8 March 2006) International IDEA has launched a new edition of its well-known handbook: Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers. The focus is on giving women elected to parliament the means to make a greater impact on politics. It includes a case study on the Inter-Parliamentary Union co-authored by Australian Sonia Palmieri. There is also a review of new trends in gender quotas by Drude Dahlerup.

    Chapters can be down loaded from the IDEA website

    How the UK brought human rights home

    In an article for New Matilda, Kate Beattie examines the experience of the United Kingdom with its Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) and the lessons for Australia. She finds that one of the most important aspects has been the requirement that Ministers issue a statement concerning the compatibility of Bills with the HRA and the subsequent scrutiny by the well-resourced Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights. The reports issued by the Joint Committee have had a significant influence on legislation.

    Read the New Matilda article


    Upper House for Queensland?

    The University of Queensland's Centre for Public, International, and Comparative Law, and the Faculty of Business at the University of the Sunshine Coast are hosting a conference considering whether accountability in Queensland would be better served by re-establishing an upper house. The conference, which has an impressive range of speakers from politics, the public service, and academia, takes place on April 21, and, ironically, comes in the wake of the Mike Rann's successful election campaign in South Australia which, amongst other things, promised to abolish the State's upper house.

    Read about the Conference

    Clerk of the Senate defends estimates process

    Clerk of the Senate, Harry Evans, addressed the National Press Club on 11 April 2006 on ‘Senate estimates and the Government Majority in the Senate’. In it, he warned against any neutering of the Senate estimates process, which plays a central part in the government's accountability to parliament.

     

    Political donations

    Democrat Senator Andrew Murray has established a new website monitoring donations to political parties. Senator Murray was one of the participants in an Audit workshop on Political Finance and Government Advertising held in February 2006.

     

    March 8 2006

     

            Electoral reform  

    Gary Nairn, Special Minister for State, has defended the Government’s proposed reforms of the Commonwealth Electoral Act in a piece in The Canberra Times.


            British democracy inquiry reports posted 8 March 2006

    The Power inquiry into the health of UK democracy reported on 27 February 2006. Whilst addressing the UK, the findings will have resonance elsewhere, including Australia.

    The report concludes that, contrary to much opinion, the British public is not politically apathetic, in spite of falling voter turn-out and party membership. However, the public does feel excluded from the policy process, and poorly served by party politics, with the electoral system perceived as unequal.

    Amongst the 30 recommendations are concordats redistributing power away from ministers to Parliament and local government; 70 per cent of the House of Lords to be elected; public funding and caps for individual donations to parties; electoral reform (away from first-past-the-post) to encourage small parties and Independents; the right for citizens to initiate new laws and public inquiries; and the requirement for MPs to produce annual reports and hold AGMs with their constituents.

    The full report and the executive summary can be found at Power webpage: http://www.powerinquiry.org


            UK postal voting concerns posted 8 March 2006

    The Society of Local Authority Chief Executives has reignited the debate about postal voting in the UK, with warnings that the forthcoming local elections risk being marred by a further postal voting controversy, after several councillors were found guilty of electoral fraud in the 2004 elections. The problems arise because of the way local party activists collect postal votes and place them on the voters’ behalf. Whilst the aim may be to boost turn-out, the fear is that votes not cast in favour of the party handling them may be ‘lost’. [The government has introduced new legislation to deal with postal voting fraud that will come into effect before the May 2006 local government elections.]



            Women in parliament: paradise postponed posted 6 March 2006

    The Treasurer, Peter Costello, has called for Australia to create the most 'female-friendly environment in the world'. Marian Sawer finds, however, that Australia has just slid to its lowest place ever in the league table of women's representation in national parliaments and a major factor has been the Liberal Party's failure to preselect women.

    February 28 2006

    Independent Candidate Advisory Network

    In October 2005, the three independents in the House of Representatives - Peter Andren, Tony Windsor and Bob Katter - founded the Independent Candidate Advisory Network (ICAN) to encourage and assist independents to get elected to state and federal parliaments. The website was launched this month. Among the ICAN website's features is an ' Independent's Tool-Box', a guide to everything from getting nominated to managing the campaign budget and handling the media. Two weeks ago, the organisation featured in a Senate Committee question from Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce to the Australian Electoral Commissioner.

    Visit the ICAN website

    February 10 2006

    Nice work, if you can get it

    Anne Davies, Damien Murphy and Elisabeth Sexton report in the SMH on the lack of codes for post-ministerial employment in Commonwealth and NSW jurisdictions. They describe a number of recent cases where Ministers have gone immediately into private sector jobs close to their ministerial portfolios, despite warnings from corruption bodies about the practice. Canada and the United Kingdom, and other Australian jurisdictions such as Tasmania, South Australia, Western Australia and the ACT, have recognised the problem and adopted such codes. In 2004 the Democratic Audit (Report No 3) recommended that codes governing post-separation employment of ministers be adopted in all Australian jurisdictions. Read the article.

    Political donations revealed

    The Australian Electoral Commission's latest political donations disclosures have generated a lot of comment:

    The single largest donation, $1,000,000 from Lord Ashcroft to the Liberals, was also the most controversial: Ashcroft is a former treasurer, and current Deputy Chairman of the British Conservative Party but also, controversially, holds dual nationality from Britain and the tax haven of Belize, for which he was the permanent representative at the UN. Concern was expressed in Britain about his role in politics there, given his continuing close relationship with a foreign government. Despite claims by the Liberals that Lord Ashcroft has a close affinity with Australia, it seems that he has no particular association with it beyond that of keen visitor. His contribution has naturally raised questions about the role of foreign donations to political parties in Australia. Read more in The Australian. (Last checked Feb 10 2006.)

    Crikey has carried a more detailed analysis of the disclosures, including a list of the largest ten donors to Labor and the Liberals:

    10 Largest Donors to Liberals

    Lord Michael Ashcroft KCMG - $1,000,000.00
    Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd - $200,000.00
    Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd - $200,000.00
    Village Roadshow Limited - $200,000.00
    Croissy Pty Limited - $175,000.00
    ANZ Banking Group Ltd - $100,000.00
    Mistral International Pty Ltd - $100,000.00
    Walker Corporation Pty Ltd - $100,000.00
    Wesfarmers Ltd - $100,000.00
    JP Morgan Administrative Services Pty Ltd - $82,500.00

    Total Receipts: $29,477,988.00

    10 Largest Donors to Labor

    CFMEU Mining & Energy Division - $470,000.00
    Shop Distributive & Allied Employees' Association - $300,000.00
    CFMEU Construction & General Division, National Office - $200,000.00
    Village Roadshow Limited - $200,000.00
    Westfield Capital Corporation Ltd - $175,000.00
    Canberra Tradesmen's Union Club - $120,000.00
    AMWU - $100,000.00
    Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd - $100,000.00
    Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd - $100,000.00
    Network Ten Pty Limited - $75,000.00

    Total receipts: $29,989,686.00

    In The Age, Joo-Cheong Tham, of Melbourne University's Law School and the co-author of the Democratic Audit of Australia's forthcoming report on Political Finance, criticises the role of corporate funding of political parties. He argues that at both State and Federal level, the parties are becoming dangerously reliant on corporate funding, and calls for tighter regulations around disclosure. Read the article.

    In the Sydney Morning Herald, Elisabeth Sexton argues that, in spite of the deluge of information from the AEC, the disclosures are still opaque and important information can remain hidden. Read the article.

    Reshuffle

    Last month's cabinet reshuffle has seen Hon Sen Eric Abetz replaced as Special Minister of State (covering electoral matters) with Hon Gary Nairn MP.

    High Court appeal allowed in important FOI case

    On 3 February 2006 three judges of the High Court (Gummow, Kirby & Hayne JJ) granted special leave to appeal to the High Court against the majority decision of the Full Federal Court in McKinnon v Secretary, Department of Treasury (2005) 220 ALR 587.

    The FOI appeal has been financed by News Limited in conjunction with a number of other media organisations. The case concerns the powers of the Administrative Appeal Tribunal to review decisions when a minister has issued a conclusive certificate, claiming the release of documents would be contrary to the public interest. The transcript of the hearing can be found here.

    Blair defeated over religious hatred laws

    The British Government was defeated in its attempt to introduce laws on religious hatred. The laws were designed to tighten a loophole that protects against discrimination and abuse against racial minorities, and covers Sikhs and Jews, but not Muslims. However, there were concerns that the laws would make legitimate criticism of faith, including much satire, illegal. A high profile campaign, which included high profile comedians such as Rowan Atkinson was waged against it. Ultimately though, despite a significant backbench revolt, the bill was defeated due to a miscalculation by the Labour Party Whips Office, who had thought it unnecessary to bring back a by-election campaign team for the vote. Ironically, the Government was defeated on one of the votes by just one, after the Prime Minister missed it.

    The first defeat, by 288 votes to 278, was aimed at ensuring the new laws would not affect the current racial hatred laws. The second vote, which the government lost by 283 votes to 282, said the law should only criminalise "threatening" behaviour, not things which were just "abusive and insulting". It also means people can only be prosecuted if they intend to stir up hatred - not if they are merely "reckless".

    Go to previous breaking news