Select Subject
   SHOW ALL RECORDS
Sort by:
Current Page #: 10
Total Number of Pages: 22
 
Select Page(s): | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
    (list all records on one page)

The regulation of election campaign financing in Canada and New Zealand   
   posted: 20/03/2006
Author(s): Andrew Geddis (University of Otago)
Category: Political Finance/Govt Advertising; Incumbency benefits; - Audit paper
Paper delivered by Andrew Geddis to the Audit's Political Finance Workshop held at the ANU on February 25 2006.

Guaranteed Failure: it's just never the right time for funding reform   
   posted: 20/03/2006
Author(s): Andrew Murray (Australian Democrats Senator)
Category: Political Finance/Govt Advertising; Incumbency benefits; - Audit paper
Paper delivered by Democrats Senator Andrew Murray to the Audit's Political Finance Workshop held at the ANU on February 25 2006.

Government advertising - informational or self-promotional?    (published: 3/2006)
   posted: 20/03/2006
Author(s): Graeme Orr (Griffith University)
Category: Political Finance/Govt Advertising; Incumbency benefits; - Audit paper
Paper delivered by Dr Graeme Orr to the Audit's Political Finance Workshop held at the ANU on February 25 2006.

The Auditor-General's role in politics   
   posted: 20/03/2006
Author(s): Tony Harris (former NSW Auditor-General)
Category: Political Finance/Govt Advertising; Incumbency benefits; - Audit paper
Paper delivered by former NSW Auditor-General Tony Harris to the Audit's Political Finance Workshop held at the ANU on February 25 2006.

It’s time? Reforming political financing in Australia   
   posted: 20/03/2006
Author(s): Peter van Onselen (Edith Cowan University)
Category: Political Finance/Govt Advertising; Incumbency benefits; - Audit paper
Paper delivered by Peter van Onselen to the Audit's Political Finance Workshop held at the ANU on February 25 2006.

Political donations   
   posted: 11/03/2006
Author(s):
Category: Political Finance/Govt Advertising; - Breaking news/external links
The Australian Electoral Commission's latest political donations disclosures have generated a lot of comment. The single largest donation, $1,000,000 from Lord Ashcroft to the Liberals, was also the most controversial: Ashcroft is a former treasurer, and current Deputy Chairman of the British Conservative Party but also, controversially, holds dual nationality from Britain and the tax haven of Belize, for which he was the permanent representative at the UN. Concern was expressed in Britain about his role in politics there, given his continuing close relationship with a foreign government. Despite claims by the Liberals that Lord Ashcroft has a close affinity with Australia, it seems that he has no particular association with it beyond that of keen visitor. His contribution has naturally raised questions about the role of foreign donations to political parties in Australia.

Crikey has carried a more detailed analysis of the disclosures, including a list of the largest ten donors to Labor and the Liberals:



10 Largest Donors to Liberals



Lord Michael Ashcroft KCMG - $1,000,000.00

Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd - $200,000.00

Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd - $200,000.00

Village Roadshow Limited - $200,000.00

Croissy Pty Limited - $175,000.00

ANZ Banking Group Ltd - $100,000.00

Mistral International Pty Ltd - $100,000.00

Walker Corporation Pty Ltd - $100,000.00

Wesfarmers Ltd - $100,000.00

JP Morgan Administrative Services Pty Ltd - $82,500.00



Total Receipts: $29,477,988.00



10 Largest Donors to Labor



CFMEU Mining & Energy Division - $470,000.00

Shop Distributive & Allied Employees' Association - $300,000.00

CFMEU Construction & General Division, National Office - $200,000.00

Village Roadshow Limited - $200,000.00

Westfield Capital Corporation Ltd - $175,000.00

Canberra Tradesmen's Union Club - $120,000.00

AMWU - $100,000.00

Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd - $100,000.00

Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd - $100,000.00

Network Ten Pty Limited - $75,000.00



Total receipts: $29,989,686.00


In The Age, Joo-Cheong Tham, of Melbourne University's Law School and the co-author of the Democratic Audit of Australia's forthcoming report on Political Finance, criticises the role of corporate funding of political parties. He argues that at both State and Federal level, the parties are becoming dangerously reliant on corporate funding, and calls for tighter regulations around disclosure.



In the Sydney Morning Herald , Elisabeth Sexton argues that, in spite of the deluge of information from the AEC, the disclosures are still opaque and important information can remain hidden.

Nice work, if you can get it   
   posted: 11/03/2006
Author(s):
Category: Accountability; - Breaking news/external links; Parliament
Anne Davies, Damien Murphy and Elisabeth Sexton report in the SMH on the lack of codes for post-ministerial employment in Commonwealth and NSW jurisdictions. They describe a number of recent cases where Ministers have gone immediately into private sector jobs close to their ministerial portfolios, despite warnings from corruption bodies about the practice. Canada and the United Kingdom, and other Australian jurisdictions such as Tasmania, South Australia, Western Australia and the ACT, have recognised the problem and adopted such codes. In 2004 the Democratic Audit (Report No 3) recommended that codes governing post-separation employment of ministers be adopted in all Australian jurisdictions.

Government advertising: a parliamentary perspective    (published: 3/2006)
   posted: 8/03/2006
Author(s): Harry Evans (Clerk of the Senate)
Category: Political Finance/Govt Advertising; Incumbency benefits; - Audit paper
Harry Evans, Clerk of the Senate, reviews the appropriations process as it relates to Government spending on advertising. He suggests that appropriations are made for ends that are specified only in the vaguest terms. Consequently, little limit is applied to the purposes on which the money may be spent.

Expansive franchise    (published: 3/2006)
   posted: 8/03/2006
Author(s): Kate Sullivan (UK Electoral Commission)
Category: Electoral; Rights; - Audit paper
Kate Sullivan of the UK Electoral Commission reviews who can vote in the UK and finds that the franchise is much more expansive in Britain than in Australia.

Let The chips fall where they may    (published: 3/2006)
   posted: 8/03/2006
Author(s): Malcolm Mackerras (University of NSW & Australian Defence Force Academy)
Category: Electoral; Electoral; Constitution/federalism
Malcolm Mackerras considers the best way to achieve the principle of 'one vote one value' in Australia and decides that it can only be achieved for the Territories by using the number of voters on the roll rather than population as the basis for distribution. This would give the ACT back its third seat and resolve the problem of the 2004 election when a vote in the Northern Territory was worth twice one in the ACT. It would be consistent with s122 of the Constitution, Mackerras believes.


Select Page(s): | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |     (list all records on one page)